Determining normal and abnormal reference values for corrective osteotomy for congenital hand malformation: a study

Ahmad Zaki Barati1, Anyuan Wang1, Ismail Muhammad1

  • 1Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.

Insights

This study establishes normal thumb bone axis reference values for children, aiding corrective osteotomies in congenital hand malformations and polydactyly. Accurate preoperative planning using these values improves surgical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Pediatric orthopedics
  • Hand surgery

Background:

  • Congenital hand malformations require precise surgical correction.
  • Assessing bone alignment is crucial for effective osteotomy procedures in children.
  • Establishing normal reference values aids in evaluating deviations and planning treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish normal reference values for the pediatric thumb bone axis.
  • To assess the effectiveness of corrective osteotomy procedures.
  • To guide treatment for congenital hand malformations and post-operative axis deviations.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 192 individuals (January 2022 - October 2024).
  • Measurement of bone axis angles in the metacarpal, proximal, and distal phalanges of the thumb.
  • Comparison of normal reference values with those from patients with polydactyly types II and IV.

Main Results:

  • Established comprehensive reference values for the normal thumb bone axis.
  • Identified axis deviation in polydactyly type IV, correlating with surgical planning needs.
  • Highlighted the importance of preoperative design for thumb reconstruction and potential for intraoperative site selection.

Conclusions:

  • Reference values for thumb bone alignment significantly aid corrective osteotomy planning.
  • These values enable surgeons to predict necessary osteotomy degrees, enhancing surgical results.
  • Improved preoperative assessment leads to better postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Abstract