Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
The impact of health maintenance organizations on improving cardiac surgery outcomes
Kimberly L Skidmore1,2, Farrah E Flattmann3, Hayden Cagle4
1Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Insights
Integrating primary care within hospital networks improves outcomes for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This approach can reduce mortality rates, especially in low-income, low-volume areas, saving lives.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Surgical Outcomes
- Health Policy
Background:
- California mandates mortality reporting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
- The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid restructuring may inadvertently penalize low-income patients by prioritizing surgical payments over primary care.
- Integrated care models within hospital networks may enhance surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between socioeconomic factors, hospital volume, and CABG surgery outcomes.
- To compare outcomes in a health maintenance organization (HMO) with integrated primary care versus individual hospitals.
- To identify features of integrated care that may lower mortality rates.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study of 58 Northern California hospitals from 2009-2020, analyzing data from 2009 and 2020.
- Hospitals were categorized by income and population, defining low-income and low-volume criteria.
- Qualitative evidence synthesis and Chi-square analysis were used to assess mortality rates and risk.
Main Results:
- Low-income, low-volume hospitals showed higher crude mortality rates (2.72% vs. 1.69%) compared to other hospitals.
- Patients in low-income, low-volume hospitals had a 61% higher relative mortality risk (1.61).
- These hospitals also had higher readmission (11.12%) and stroke (1.84%) rates.
Conclusions:
- Informal communication and integrated HMO policies appear to improve CABG outcomes.
- Referring patients from low-income, low-volume hospitals to higher-volume institutions could save lives.
- Integrated care models within hospital networks demonstrate potential for significantly lower mortality rates.
Background And Objectives:
California is one of a few states with mandatory reporting of mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The Affordable Care Act restructured Medicaid, preferentially penalizing patients experiencing poverty because payments to hospitals for isolated surgical events overshadow payments to primary care clinicians. We propose outcomes are superior when hospital networks organize surgical episodes within the context of primary care inside that same network.
Design And Methods:
We listed factors impacting outcomes after CABG. CABG surgery outcome depends upon the integration of issues beginning years preoperatively and extending for decades. Therefore, we studied one health maintenance organization (HMO) from 2009 to 2020 compared to surrounding individual hospitals. We divided 58 hospitals in Northern California in 2009 according to income and population. To focus on changes introduced because of COVID-19, we compared a public database for the subset in 2009 for any relationship between poverty in a zip code and low volumes of CABG in that area to overall mortality in 2020. First, we defined low-income zip codes as those with a higher rate of poverty than the state average or with a lower per capita average income, per Census Bureau. Second, low volume was defined as a population under 165,000 because a hospital adjacent to a larger community can easily transfer care, sharing surgeons and processes. Third, we defined low volume as fewer than 180 CABG per year.
Results:
Our qualitative evidence synthesis reveals that informal communication and hospital HMO policies improve CABG outcomes. In our small pilot data, Chi-square analysis showed higher crude mortality rates in 1507 CABG in 17 low-income low-volume hospitals versus 8163 CABG in the other 41 Northern California hospitals (2.72% vs 1.69%, p = 0.0064). Low-income low-volume hospitals had a relative mortality risk of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.14-2.27). These hospitals had a mean mortality rate of 3.79%, readmission 11.12%, and stroke 1.84%. A patient undergoing CABG in a low-income low-volume hospital has a 61% higher chance of dying. The number needed to treat analysis shows that one life can potentially be saved for every 97 patients referred to another institution.
Conclusion:
We describe features of an HMO that contribute to up to fourfold lower mortality rates.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System