Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of Liver Disease Staging in Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Microsimulation Study
- Rachel L Epstein 1,2,3, Sarah Munroe 3, Lynn E Taylor 4,5, Patrick R Duryea 4, Benjamin Buzzee 3, Tannishtha Pramanick 3, Jordan J Feld 6, Dimitri Baptiste 3, Matthew Carroll 3, Laurent Castera 7, Richard K Sterling 8, Aurielle Thomas 4, Philip A Chan 9,10, Benjamin P Linas 1,3
- Rachel L Epstein 1,2,3, Sarah Munroe 3, Lynn E Taylor 4,5
- 1Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- 2Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- 3Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- 4Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Research, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
- 5Department of Primary Care, HealthFirst Family Care Center Inc., Fall River, Massachusetts, USA.
- 6Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- 7Department of Hepatology, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Clichy, France.
- 8Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
- 9Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
- 10Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
- 0Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.For chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) staging alone offers the best clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Treatment should not be delayed for transient elastography (TE) staging.
Area Of Science
- Hepatology
- Medical Economics
- Public Health
Background
- Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection management requires accurate liver disease assessment.
- Current guidelines for pre-treatment fibrosis staging in HCV vary, presenting challenges in balancing test availability and accuracy.
- This study evaluates the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of different fibrosis staging strategies for HCV.
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of various fibrosis staging strategies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
- To determine the optimal testing modality for HCV fibrosis assessment in a US healthcare setting.
- To inform clinical guidelines regarding pre-treatment evaluation for HCV.
Main Methods
- A lifetime microsimulation model was used to compare five strategies for adults with chronic HCV in US health centers.
- Strategies included no staging, Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) alone, transient elastography (TE) alone, a staged approach (FIB-4 followed by TE for intermediate scores), and both tests for all patients.
- Outcomes assessed included infection cure rates, cirrhosis development, liver-related deaths, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), using a Medicaid perspective and 2021 costs.
Main Results
- The Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) alone strategy yielded the best clinical outcomes: 87.7% cure rate, 8.7% cirrhosis, and 4.6% liver-related deaths.
- Transient elastography (TE) strategies resulted in lower cure rates (58.5%-76.6%) and higher rates of cirrhosis (16.8%-29.4%) and liver-related deaths (11.6%-22.6%).
- FIB-4 alone was cost-effective with an ICER of $12,869 per QALY gained compared to no staging; TE strategies were less cost-effective, particularly with loss to follow-up (LTFU).
Conclusions
- Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) staging alone provides optimal clinical outcomes and is a cost-effective approach for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
- Transient elastography (TE) strategies are associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs compared to FIB-4 alone.
- Initiating treatment for chronic HCV should not be postponed awaiting fibrosis staging via TE, especially in scenarios with potential LTFU or point-of-care testing.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

