Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Scaled-Up Preparation of an Intermediate of Upatinib, ACT051-3
Published on: April 7, 2023
Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Filgotinib and Upadacitinib for Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicentre
Akira Nogami1,2, Kunio Asonuma1, Shinji Okabayashi3
1Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, filgotinib (FIL) and upadacitinib (UPA) have emerged as promising treatments for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, a comparative analysis of these JAK inhibitors, particularly in patients previously treated with tofacitinib (TOF), has not been performed.
Aims:
To compare the efficacy and safety of FIL and UPA in patients with UC, including those previously exposed to TOF.
Methods:
A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of FIL and UPA in patients with UC whose treatment was initiated between March 2022 and December 2023. The co-primary outcomes were clinical response and remission at week 8. The secondary outcomes included treatment persistence and adverse events (AEs). Modified Poisson and Cox regression models with multivariable analysis to adjust for confounders and propensity score matching were conducted. Subgroup analyses stratified by previous exposure to TOF and biologics were also conducted.
Results:
In total, 168 patients (98 treated with FIL and 70 treated with UPA) were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up period of 181 days. The clinical response/remission rates at week 8 were 55.1/46.9% for FIL and 71.4/65.7% for UPA, respectively. UPA was associated with significantly higher rates of clinical response (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.40 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.80]) and clinical remission (adjusted RR 1.54 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.05]) compared with FIL. This result was consistent across subgroup analyses based on previous exposure to TOF or biologics, except for bio-naive patients. There was no significant difference in the treatment persistence. AEs were more frequent with UPA (45.7%) than with FIL (24.5%) (p = 0.0049). Propensity score matching confirmed the superior overall effectiveness of UPA.
Conclusions:
UPA demonstrated better short-term effectiveness than FIL, with a higher incidence of AEs.
Insights
Upadacitinib (UPA) showed higher short-term effectiveness for ulcerative colitis (UC) compared to filgotinib (FIL), including in patients previously treated with tofacitinib (TOF). However, UPA was associated with more adverse events than FIL.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, filgotinib (FIL) and upadacitinib (UPA), are emerging treatments for ulcerative colitis (UC).
- Comparative data for FIL and UPA, especially in patients with prior tofacitinib (TOF) exposure, are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of FIL versus UPA in UC patients.
- To evaluate treatment outcomes in UC patients with prior TOF exposure.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre retrospective cohort study comparing FIL and UPA in UC patients.
- Co-primary outcomes: clinical response and remission at week 8.
- Secondary outcomes: treatment persistence and adverse events (AEs).
- Used modified Poisson and Cox regression with propensity score matching for analysis.
Main Results:
- Upadacitinib (UPA) demonstrated significantly higher rates of clinical response (aRR 1.40) and remission (aRR 1.54) at week 8 compared to filgotinib (FIL).
- These findings were consistent across subgroups, including those with prior TOF or biologic exposure.
- Adverse events were more frequent with UPA (45.7%) than FIL (24.5%).
Conclusions:
- Upadacitinib (UPA) offers superior short-term effectiveness for ulcerative colitis (UC) compared to filgotinib (FIL).
- Increased adverse event incidence was observed with UPA treatment.
- Treatment persistence did not differ significantly between the two JAK inhibitors.
More Related Videos
08:27Dynamic Adhesion Assay for the Functional Analysis of Anti-adhesion Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published on: September 20, 2018
08:58Analyzing Beneficial Effects of Nutritional Supplements on Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Functions During Experimental Colitis
Published on: January 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Ulcerative Colitis
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...