Who gets the bed: Factors influencing the intensive care exit block: A qualitative study
Frances Fengzhi Lin1, Jacqueline Peet2, Lauren Murray3
1Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia; College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia; School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Queensland 4556, Australia.
Background:
Patient flow problems, including discharge delay and after-hours discharge, have been a consistently major issue, especially for intensive care units (ICUs). Evidence suggests that discharge delay and after-hours discharge are associated with increased ICU and hospital length of stay, leading to worsened patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. They can also increase ICU readmission and post-ICU mortality. The factors influencing discharge processes are not well elucidated.
Objective:
This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the ICU patient discharge processes in adult ICUs.
Methods:
This qualitative exploratory multisite observational study was conducted in three regional adult ICUs in Queensland, Australia. We used staff interviews, fieldnotes, and document analysis as data collection techniques. Data analysis commenced with a deductive content analysis using the Structure, Process, and Outcomes framework. Following this, an inductive process was taken using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Findings:
We conducted 59 staff interviews and analysed the discharge documents across three sites. Four domains, including context and resources, beliefs about consequences, social/professional role and identity, and behaviour regulation, were strongly related to the factors that influenced the discharge processes. The findings revealed barriers to discharge, including finding the right bed, disconnected and ineffective information systems, ineffective communication and coordination within and across teams and departments, and uncertainty and inconsistency in discharge decision making. Facilitators included clarity on professional roles in ICU discharge, effective communication within the ICU team, and context specific strategies to support the discharge processes.
Conclusions:
The findings provide an in-depth understanding of the barriers and facilitators to the ICU discharge processes. Multifaceted strategies should be considered to facilitate and manage ICU discharge safely and efficiently, including the use of clearer discharge criteria and guidelines, digital systems that aid communication and coordination, and early planning of ICU patient discharge.
More Related Videos
06:52Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Planning Nursing Care I
Naturalistic Observations
