Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
Published on: July 20, 2022
Pairing phase favored by magnetic frustration
A Krindges1, C V Morais1, M Schmidt2
1Instituto de Física e Matemática-Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas 96010-900, RS, Brazil.
Abstract:
The interplay between magnetic frustration and pairing is investigated by adopting a BCS-like pairing mechanism on the frustratedJ1-J2Ising model on the square lattice. The ground-state and thermal phase transitions of the model are analyzed using a fermionic formulation within a CMF method. In this approach, the lattice system is divided into identical clusters, where the intracluster dynamic is exactly solved, and the intercluster interactions are replaced by self-consistent mean fields. We introduce a framework with two pairing couplings: an intracluster local coupling,g, which controls the electron pairing and its mobility within the clusters, and an intercluster coupling,g', which adjusts the pairing mechanism between clusters. Tuningg'/gallows evaluating how the pairing phase evolves from a weak pairing coupling between clusters (clustered system) to a strong one (g'→g, homogeneous system). In the range0⩽g'/g⩽1, we find that a gradual increase ing'/gfavors the pairing phase and induces a change in criticality. In particular, our results reveal the presence of tricriticality for a certain range ofg'/g. In addition, an increase in competing magnetic interactions weakens the magnetic orders, causing the pairing phase to occur at lower strengths of pairing interactions, especially wheng'=g. Therefore, our findings support that magnetic frustration favors the pairing phase, contributing to the onset of a superconducting state.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes
Ferromagnetism
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

