Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two modes of processing visual information: implications for assessing visual impairment.

R B Post, H W Leibowitz

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Can normal outdoor activities be carried out during civil twilight?

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Nonoperatively treated type A spinal fractures: mid-term versus long-term functional outcome.

    International orthopaedics·2008
    Same author

    Return to work and quality of life in severely injured patients.

    Disability and rehabilitation·2006
    Same author

    Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures.

    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2005
    Same author

    Sagittal range of motion after a spinal fracture: does ROM correlate with functional outcome?

    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2004
    Same author

    Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device.

    Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2004
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Distinct visual processing modes, focal and ambient, are identified. Current clinical methods assess focal vision well but neglect ambient functions, potentially leading to misdiagnosis of ambient visual impairments.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Ophthalmology
    • Cognitive Psychology

    Background:

    • Visual perception involves distinct processing streams: focal for detail recognition and ambient for spatial orientation.
    • Current clinical assessments primarily evaluate focal visual functions.
    • Ambient visual functions are often overlooked in standard eye examinations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To differentiate between focal and ambient visual processing modes.
    • To highlight the limitations of current clinical techniques in assessing ambient vision.
    • To discuss the implications for developing new assessment methods for ambient visual functions.

    Main Methods:

    • The study conceptually distinguishes between focal and ambient visual processing based on existing literature.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It analyzes the capabilities of current clinical visual assessment tools.
  • It identifies the gaps in evaluating ambient visual functions.

    • Main Results:

    • Focal vision, related to recognizing visual detail, is well-assessed by current methods.
    • Ambient vision, crucial for spatial orientation, is inadequately evaluated by existing clinical techniques.
    • This diagnostic gap may lead to under- or overestimation of ambient visual impairments.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a need for improved clinical assessment tools specifically designed to evaluate ambient visual functions.
    • Accurate assessment of both focal and ambient vision is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of visual processing.
    • Developing new techniques will enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient care for visual disorders.