Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

A Simple Behavioral Assay for Testing Visual Function in Xenopus laevis
Published on: June 12, 2014
Predation Risk Experienced by Tadpoles Shapes Personalities Before but Not After Metamorphosis
Barbara Płaskonka1,2, Anna Zaborowska3, Andrzej Mikulski1
1Department of Hydrobiology, Institute of Ecology, Faculty of Biology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.
Abstract:
Consistent inter-individual differences in behaviour, that is, personalities, can emerge as a result of inter-individual differences in ontogenetic experience, and predation risk is a potent one. As personalities develop over lifetime, however, they may also be broken by ontogenetic transitions of the individual. Here we first tested the hypothesis that consistent inter-individual differences in larval behaviour arise under predation challenge, and are entangled with differences in body size. We then tested the hypothesis that adult behavioural type is related to body size rather than to larval behavioural phenotype. To test these hypotheses, we performed a longitudinal study following the development of about 50 moor frogs, Rana arvalis. We manipulated their larval and current environment, and recorded their behaviours repeatedly, under control conditions, invertebrate predators' chemical cues or in live predator presence. Partially in line with our predictions, the ontogenetic experience of predator presence led to personality emergence in tadpoles, yet their behaviour was not explained by their body size. This pattern was lost over metamorphosis. According to predictions, pre-adult moor frog behaviour was affected by their body size-time to exit shelter was shorter in larger frogs-but neither by their behaviour as tadpoles nor by their larval environment, that is, tadpole predator-exposure experience. Our results show that individual behavioural tendencies can be well decoupled between prior and post metamorphosis, which adds to the growing empirical evidence supporting adaptive decoupling hypothesis.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Frequency-dependent Selection
Fixed Action Patterns
Types of Selection

