Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Recent Trends in Academic Versus Nonacademic Radiologist Compensation and Clinical Productivity
Ajay Malhotra1, Dheeman Futela2, Rudra Joshi2
1Professor, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Background:
Recent radiologist compensation and clinical productivity trends have not been well characterized, especially across academic versus nonacademic practice settings.
Purpose:
To assess recent trends in in financial compensation and clinical productivity between academic and nonacademic settings in diagnostic radiology (DR) and interventional radiology (IR).
Materials And Methods:
We studied deidentified data from the Medical Group Management Association for both DR and IR physicians in academic and nonacademic practices from 2014 to 2023. Median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and mean values were analyzed for compensation, collections, and work relative value units (wRVUs). Compensation and productivity data were compared by radiology subspecialty (DR versus IR), practice type (academic versus nonacademic provider), geographical region of the United States, and practice size. Trends in absolute changes were analyzed with linear regression.
Results:
The Medical Group Management Association Survey data for 2023 included responses for 3,769 radiologists (2,883 in DR and 886 in IR). In 2023, nonacademic radiologists had greater total median compensation than academic faculty in both DR (by 27%) and IR (by 32%). From 2014 to 2023, median compensation increased faster for academic DR physicians (3.2% annually) than for nonacademic DR physicians (1.9% annually). In 2023, DR physicians produced greater median wRVUs than IR physicians (by 53% for nonacademic and 46% for academic radiologists) with higher collections, but IR physicians had higher compensation (by 16% in nonacademic and 10% in academic settings). Over the last decade, IR physician compensation increased by 3.9% and 3.4% annually for nonacademic and academic IR physicians, respectively, whereas median wRVUs trended downward (by -1.5% for nonacademic and -2.4% for academic physicians) with declining collections (by -4.4% annually for nonacademic and -2.1% for academic physicians).
Conclusion:
Over the last decade, the salary gap between academic and nonacademic radiologists has narrowed. Physician compensation has increased at a faster pace in IR, despite relatively lower clinical productivity and declining collections.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
X-ray Imaging
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

