Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Enhancing Lesion Detection in Inflammatory Myelopathies: A Deep Learning-Reconstructed Double Inversion Recovery MRI
Qiang Fang1, Qing Yang1, Bao Wang1
1From the Department of Radiology (Q.F., Q.Y., B. Wang, J.H.), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Background And Purpose:
The imaging of inflammatory myelopathies has advanced significantly across time, with MRI techniques playing a pivotal role in enhancing lesion detection. However, the impact of deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction on 3D double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging for inflammatory myelopathies remains unassessed. This study aimed to compare the acquisition time, image quality, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detection rates among sagittal T2WI, standard DIR, and DL-reconstructed DIR in patients with inflammatory myelopathies.
Materials And Methods:
In this observational study, patients diagnosed with inflammatory myelopathies were recruited between June 2023 and March 2024. Each patient underwent sagittal conventional TSE sequences and standard 3D DIR (T2WI and standard 3D DIR were used as references for comparison), followed by an undersampled accelerated double inversion recovery deep learning (DIRDL) examination. Three neuroradiologists evaluated the images using a 4-point Likert scale (from 1 to 4) for overall image quality, perceived SNR, sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence. The acquisition times and lesion detection rates were also compared among the acquisition protocols.
Results:
A total of 149 participants were evaluated (mean age, 40.6 [SD, 16.8] years; 71 women). The median acquisition time for DIRDL was significantly lower than for standard DIR (298 seconds [interquartile range, 288-301 seconds] versus 151 seconds [interquartile range, 148-155 seconds]; P < .001), showing a 49% time reduction. DIRDL images scored higher in overall quality, perceived SNR, and artifact noise reduction (all P < .001). There were no significant differences in sharpness (P = .07) or diagnostic confidence (P = .06) between the standard DIR and DIRDL protocols. Additionally, DIRDL detected 37% more lesions compared with T2WI (300 versus 219; P < .001).
Conclusions:
DIRDL significantly reduces acquisition time and improves image quality compared with standard DIR, without compromising diagnostic confidence. Additionally, DIRDL enhances lesion detection in patients with inflammatory myelopathies, making it a valuable tool in clinical practice. These findings underscore the potential for incorporating DIRDL into future imaging guidelines.
More Related Videos
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
12:50Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly
Published on: April 14, 2014