Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
Published on: October 13, 2017
Effects of a dog activity tracker on owners' walking: a community-based randomised controlled trial
Matthew N Ahmadi1, Raaj Kishore Biswas2, Lauren Powell3
1Hub D17, Charles Perkins Centre L6 West, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. matthew.ahmadi@sydney.edu.au.
Objective:
A promising strategy to increase population physical activity is through promotion of dog walking. Informed by multi-process action control and nascent dog-walking theory, we examined the effectiveness of a 3-month technology-based (dog tracker) 2-arm randomised controlled dog-walking intervention to increase dog-owner daily physical activity in the general community in Sydney, Australia.
Results:
37 participants were allocated to the intervention group (mean age = 43.2 [SD 11.9]) and 40 to the control group (mean age = 42.3 [SD 11.9]). Both groups averaged more than 10,500 steps/day at baseline. There was no evidence of within- or between-group physical activity differences across timepoints. The results remained consistent after exclusion of participants who had data collected during COVID-19 lockdowns. Compared with baseline, both groups had significant increases in sedentary time during the post-intervention, and 6 month follow-up. The absence of significant differences between-group physical activity differences may be attributable to the ceiling effect of both groups already being sufficiently active. These results provide useful guidance to future studies intended to assess the efficacy of technology-based dog-walking interventions. Future dog-walking interventions should specifically target physically inactive dog owners.
Trial Registration:
ACTRN12619001391167 (10/10/2019); Retrospectively registered.

