Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
Automated face recognition assists with low-prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users
Melina Mueller1, Peter J B Hancock1, Emily K Cunningham1
1Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Abstract:
We present three experiments to study the effects of giving information about the decision of an automated face recognition (AFR) system to participants attempting to decide whether two face images show the same person. We make three contributions designed to make our results applicable to real-word use: participants are given the true response of a highly accurate AFR system; the face set reflects the mixed ethnicity of the city of London from where participants are drawn; and there are only 10% of mismatches. Participants were equally accurate when given the similarity score of the AFR system or just the binary decision but shifted their bias towards match and were over-confident on difficult pairs when given only binary information. No participants achieved the 100% accuracy of the AFR system, and they had only weak insight about their own performance.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Prosopagnosia
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Methods of Classification and Identification
Stereotype Content Model
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

