Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Enhancing Bias Assessment for Complex Term Groups in Language Embedding Models: Quantitative Comparison of Methods
Magnus Gray1, Mariofanna Milanova2, Leihong Wu1
1Division of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, United States.
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being adopted to build products and aid in the decision-making process across industries. However, AI systems have been shown to exhibit and even amplify biases, causing a growing concern among people worldwide. Thus, investigating methods of measuring and mitigating bias within these AI-powered tools is necessary.
Objective:
In natural language processing applications, the word embedding association test (WEAT) is a popular method of measuring bias in input embeddings, a common area of measure bias in AI. However, certain limitations of the WEAT have been identified (ie, their nonrobust measure of bias and their reliance on predefined and limited groups of words or sentences), which may lead to inadequate measurements and evaluations of bias. Thus, this study takes a new approach at modifying this popular measure of bias, with a focus on making it more robust and applicable in other domains.
Methods:
In this study, we introduce the SD-WEAT, which is a modified version of the WEAT that uses the SD of multiple permutations of the WEATs to calculate bias in input embeddings. With the SD-WEAT, we evaluated the biases and stability of several language embedding models, including Global Vectors for Word Representation (GloVe), Word2Vec, and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT).
Results:
This method produces results comparable to those of the WEAT, with strong correlations between the methods' bias scores or effect sizes (r=0.786) and P values (r=0.776), while addressing some of its largest limitations. More specifically, the SD-WEAT is more accessible, as it removes the need to predefine attribute groups, and because the SD-WEAT measures bias over multiple runs rather than one, it reduces the impact of outliers and sample size. Furthermore, the SD-WEAT was found to be more consistent and reliable than its predecessor.
Conclusions:
Thus, the SD-WEAT shows promise for robustly measuring bias in the input embeddings fed to AI language models.
More Related Videos
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
08:17A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In- and Out-Groups
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination