Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Detection of MicroRNA Expression in the Kidneys of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathic Mice
Published on: July 8, 2020
Clinical characteristics of monoclonal immunoglobulin-associated renal disease: a retrospective cohort study
Toshiyuki Narimiya1, Hiroki Hayashi2, Soshiro Ogata3
1Department of Nephrology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Introduction:
Clinical epidemiological data on monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) are lacking. In this retrospective observational study, MGRS was compared with B-cell or plasma cell malignancies (BCM/PCM) with renal involvement to clarify differences in their clinical features.
Methods:
Among the 1408 renal biopsies performed at our hospital, 25 MGRS and 18 BCM/PCM patients were identified. We investigated baseline characteristics and hematologic parameters of MGRS in reference to BCM/PCM using multivariable analysis. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and all-cause mortality.
Results:
Comparing the MGRS with the BCM/PCM, mean differences in creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage were - 2.76 mg/dL, 27.72 mL/min/1.73 m2, and - 18.86%, respectively (all P < 0.001). MGRS group had a predominance of glomerular lesions such as immunoglobulin-associated amyloidosis, cryoglobulinemic GN, and MIDD, and a lower risk of acute kidney injury/acute renal disease compared to BCM/PCM. During a median observation period of 23.7 months, clone-directed therapy was performed in 32.0% of patients in the MGRS group, compared to 83.3% of patients in the BCM/PCM group. Compared with BCM/PCM, MGRS had a hazard ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-1.92, P = 0.45) for ESKD and 0.33 (95% CI 0.11-1.03, P = 0.06) for death in multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Conclusions:
The clinical characteristics of MGRS and BCM/PCM with monoclonal immunoglobulin-associated renal disease are disparate. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing tailored clinical approaches and therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcome.
More Related Videos
09:43Analyses of Proteinuria, Renal Infiltration of Leukocytes, and Renal Deposition of Proteins in Lupus-prone MRL/lpr Mice
Published on: June 8, 2022
07:15Mechanism of Kemeng Fang's Inhibition of Podocyte Apoptosis in Rats with Membranous Nephropathy through the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway
Published on: August 23, 2024