Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors
Published on: March 29, 2019
Comparative analysis of image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI, MS-EPI, and rFOV DWI in bladder cancer
Mitsuru Takeuchi1,2, Atsushi Higaki3, Yuichi Kojima3
1Department of Radiology, Radiolonet Tokai, Nagoya, Japan. m2rbimn@gmail.com.
Purpose:
To compare image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), multi-shot (MS) EPI DWI, and reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective study included 73 patients with bladder cancer who underwent multiparametric MRI in our referral center between August 2020 and February 2023. Qualitative image assessment was performed in 73; and quantitative assessment was performed in 66 patients with maximum lesion diameter > 10 mm. The diagnostic performance of the imaging finding of muscle invasion was evaluated in 47 patients with pathological confirmation of MIBC. T2-weighted imaging, SS-EPI DWI, MS-EPI DWI, rFOV DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging were acquired with 3 T-MRI. Qualitative image assessment was performed by three readers who rated anatomical distortion, clarity of bladder wall, and lesion conspicuity using a four-point scale. Quantitative assessment included calculation of SNR and CNR, and grading of the presence of muscle layer invasion according to the VI-RADS diagnostic criteria. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was used to compare qualitative and quantitative image quality. McNemar test and receiver-operating characteristic analysis were used to compare diagnostic performance.
Results:
Anatomical distortion was less in MS-EPI DWI, rFOV DWI, and SS-EPI DWI, in that order with significant difference. Clarity of bladder wall was greater for MS-EPI DWI, SS-EPI DWI, and rFOV DWI, in that order. There were significant differences between any two combinations of the three DWI types, except between SS-EPI DWI and MS-EPI in Reader 1. Lesion conspicuity, diagnostic performance, SNR and CNR were not significantly different among the three DWI types.
Conclusions:
Among the three DWI sequences evaluated, MS-EPI DWI showed the least anatomical distortion and superior bladder wall delineation but no improvement in diagnostic performance for MIBC. MS-EPI DWI may be considered for additional imaging if SS-EPI DWI is of poor quality.
