Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

18.8K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
18.8K
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

12.5K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
12.5K
DNA as a Genetic Template02:05

DNA as a Genetic Template

21.7K
Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...
21.7K
Labeling DNA Probes03:31

Labeling DNA Probes

8.1K
DNA probes are fragments of DNA labeled with a reporter tag to enable their detection or purification. The resulting labeled DNA probes can then hybridize to target nucleic acid sequences through complementary base-pairing, and may be used to recover or identify these regions.
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
8.1K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

7.9K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
7.9K
Sanger Sequencing01:57

Sanger Sequencing

753.0K
DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...
753.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular dynamics simulations refine the pathogenicity of ACVRL1 kinase domain variants by quantifying impacts on ATP binding in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Journal of structural biology·2026
Same author

Prediction of protein-protein interactions using point transformer and spherical Convex Hull graphs.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

Multimodal graph, surface, and language-based model for protein protein interaction prediction.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

GQ-DNABERT reveals GQ proximal enhancer-promoter interactions associated with tissue-specific transcription.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Host cell Z-RNAs activate ZBP1 during virus infections.

Nature·2025
Same author

Deep learning deciphers the related role of master regulators and G-quadruplexes in tissue specification.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: FISH as a Tool for Precise Gene Amplification Assessment in Cancer Specimens
03:55

Author Spotlight: FISH as a Tool for Precise Gene Amplification Assessment in Cancer Specimens

Published on: July 12, 2024

1.2K

Data augmentation with generative models improves detection of Non-B DNA structures.

Oleksandr Cherednichenko1, Maria Poptsova1

  • 1International Laboratory of Bioinformatics, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Computers in Biology and Medicine
|November 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates diffusion models for generating synthetic non-B DNA structures, improving whole-genome annotation. Diffusion models show promise, but trade-offs exist between quality, diversity, and speed compared to other generative models.

Keywords:
Data augmentationDiffusion modelFliponsGenerative modelNon-B DNAVector quantised variational autoencoderWasserstein generative adversarial network

More Related Videos

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

20.5K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

678

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: FISH as a Tool for Precise Gene Amplification Assessment in Cancer Specimens
03:55

Author Spotlight: FISH as a Tool for Precise Gene Amplification Assessment in Cancer Specimens

Published on: July 12, 2024

1.2K
Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

20.5K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

678

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Non-B DNA structures, or flipons, are crucial for cellular functions.
  • Current experimental methods for flipon detection are limited and cannot capture whole-genome sets.
  • Accurate whole-genome annotation of non-B DNA relies on deep learning models, necessitating high-quality training data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of diffusion models in generating synthetic non-B DNA structures for data augmentation.
  • To compare diffusion models against other generative models (WGAN, VQ-VAE) for this task.
  • To evaluate the impact of data augmentation using synthetic non-B DNA structures on classifier performance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized denoising diffusion probabilistic and implicit models (DDPM and DDIM).
  • Compared diffusion models with Wasserstein generative adversarial network (WGAN) and vector quantised variational autoencoder (VQ-VAE).
  • Employed a data augmentation strategy combining synthetic and real biological data.

Main Results:

  • Data augmentation using generated synthetic non-B DNA structures significantly improved classifier performance.
  • Diffusion models generally outperformed other generative models in generating synthetic non-B DNA structures.
  • Analysis revealed trade-offs among diffusion models concerning sample quality, diversity, and sampling speed.

Conclusions:

  • Diffusion models are effective for generating synthetic non-B DNA structures, enhancing genomic annotation.
  • While diffusion models excel, WGAN and VQ-VAE offer alternative trade-offs in the generative trilemma (quality, diversity, speed).
  • Further research can optimize generative models for comprehensive non-B DNA annotation.