Long-Term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
- Kyung In Shin 1, Min Sung Yoon 1, Jee Hoon Kim 1, Won Joon Jang 1, Galam Leem 1,2, Jung Hyun Jo 1,2, Moon Jae Chung 1,2, Jeong Youp Park 1,2, Seung Woo Park 1,2, Ho Kyoung Hwang 3, Chang Moo Kang 3, Seung-Seob Kim 3, Mi-Suk Park 4, Hee Seung Lee 1,2, Seungmin Bang 1,2
- Kyung In Shin 1, Min Sung Yoon 1, Jee Hoon Kim 1
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 2Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 3Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 4Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 0Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Neoadjuvant therapy significantly improves survival and surgical outcomes for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared to upfront surgery. This approach offers better progression-free survival and enhanced resection rates for PDAC patients.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
Background
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis.
- Treatment strategies for resectable PDAC include upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.
- Comparing long-term outcomes of these approaches is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery in resectable PDAC.
- To evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on surgical outcomes, including R0 resection rates, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 202 patients with resectable PDAC.
- Comparison between 167 patients who underwent upfront surgery and 35 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.
- Propensity score matching was employed to minimize selection bias and ensure comparable groups.
Main Results
- Neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated significantly longer OS (72.7 vs. 28.3 months) and PFS (29.6 vs. 13.2 months) compared to upfront surgery.
- Neoadjuvant therapy resulted in higher R0 resection rates (74.3% vs. 49.5%), smaller tumor size (22.0 vs. 28.0 mm), and reduced lymphovascular invasion (20.0% vs. 52.4%).
Conclusions
- Neoadjuvant therapy offers significant survival benefits and improved surgical outcomes for patients with resectable PDAC.
- These findings suggest neoadjuvant therapy is a valuable strategy for managing PDAC, potentially delaying disease progression and enhancing resectability.
- Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results and establish neoadjuvant therapy as a standard of care for resectable PDAC.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

