Measuring brain perfusion by CT or MR as ancillary tests for diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and

João N Ramos1,2, Catarina Pinto3, Vera Cruz E Silva4

  • 1Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, 1349-019, Portugal.

BJR Open
|November 18, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Cerebral perfusion imaging using CT or MRI shows high accuracy for diagnosing brain death. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these promising findings.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Brain death (BD) diagnosis requires accurate confirmation of cessation of cerebral blood flow.
  • Established methods like CT angiography (CTA) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) are used, but novel imaging techniques are being explored.
  • Perfusion imaging, including CT perfusion (CTP) and MR perfusion (MRP), offers a potential alternative or adjunct for assessing cerebral blood flow.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and synthesize evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of CTP and MRP for diagnosing brain death.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of perfusion imaging in BD diagnosis compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022336353).
  • Relevant studies were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.
  • Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, and meta-analysis used univariate random-effects models.

Main Results:

  • Ten studies including 328 patients were analyzed.
  • Perfusion imaging, predominantly CTP (8 studies), demonstrated a high sensitivity of 96.1% (95% CI, 89.5-98.6) for diagnosing BD.
  • Publication bias was identified, and other diagnostic metrics could not be calculated.

Conclusions:

  • CTP or MRP show very high sensitivity for BD diagnosis, comparable to CTA and TCD.
  • However, due to the retrospective nature and limitations of included studies, results should be interpreted cautiously.
  • Prospective, multi-center studies with standardized parameters and control groups are essential for validating perfusion imaging in BD assessment.