Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Defining the tipping point for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Timothy R Buchanan1, Kevin A Hao2, Robert J Cueto1
1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
This study identified patient-reported functional score thresholds for revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). These tipping points aid surgeons in counseling patients considering revision surgery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly common.
- Understanding patient-defined thresholds for surgery is crucial for appropriate intervention.
- Previous research has not clearly defined these functional tipping points for revision rTSA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the functional tipping point values for patients undergoing their first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).
- To establish preoperative score and range of motion benchmarks that indicate patient readiness for revision surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-institution database.
- Analysis of 125 first revision rTSA cases between August 2015 and December 2019.
- Evaluation of preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scores, along with active range of motion (abduction, forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation).
Main Results:
- Identified tipping points: ASES 37.6, raw Constant 30.5, normalized Constant 35.5, SPADI 68.1, SST 3.7, UCLA 13.2, abduction 64°, forward elevation 69°, external rotation 23°, internal rotation 3.1.
- Higher SST scores correlated with older age and lower BMI.
- Lower abduction and forward elevation tipping points were observed in revisions for rotator cuff failure, unexplained pain, and implant wear.
Conclusions:
- Established specific functional score and range of motion tipping points for first revision rTSA.
- These findings provide objective criteria for surgical decision-making and patient counseling.
- Understanding these thresholds can optimize the timing of revision surgery for improved patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022