Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

245
Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
245

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research should be conducted with us, not on us: Perspectives on Alzheimer's disease clinical trials for persons with Down syndrome.

Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of agingĀ·2026
Same author

Drug Development.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationĀ·2025
Same author

"Being brave, being seen, and having your voice heard": Perspectives of self-advocates and families toward accessible and impactful research of Alzheimer's disease in down syndrome.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationĀ·2025
Same author

Recommended approaches to sharing individual research results in Alzheimer's disease research: A multidisciplinary expert Delphi consensus.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JADĀ·2025
Same author

Early clinical evaluation of a vendor developed pediatric artificial intelligence sepsis model in the emergency department.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAĀ·2025
Same author

Evaluation of Large Language Models in Tailoring Educational Content for Cancer Survivors and Their Caregivers: Quality Analysis.

JMIR cancerĀ·2025
Same journal

A Framework for Building an Inclusive Quality Program in a Pediatric Heart Center.

Pediatric quality & safetyĀ·2026
Same journal

Multidisciplinary Timely Debrief Sessions after Cardiac Arrests and Endotracheal Intubations in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Pediatric quality & safetyĀ·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Stewardship to Optimize Blood Culture in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Pediatric quality & safetyĀ·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Stewardship Quality Improvement Project for Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary NICU in Lima, Peru.

Pediatric quality & safetyĀ·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of Various Methods for the Surveillance of Hospital-acquired Venous Thromboembolism in a Children's Hospital.

Pediatric quality & safetyĀ·2026
Same journal

Standards of Care to Practice: Redefining Type 1 Diabetes Care within Learning Health Systems.

Pediatric quality & safetyĀ·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
11:45

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.0K

The Business Case for Simulation-based Hospital Design Testing; $90M Saved in Costs Avoided.

Nora Colman1, Christopher Chelette2, Jayne Woodward2

  • 1From the Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga.

Pediatric Quality & Safety
|November 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simulation-based hospital design testing (SbHDT) identified numerous safety issues early, preventing costly post-construction changes. This approach significantly reduced expenses by mitigating risks before building, proving financially practical for healthcare facilities.

More Related Videos

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.3K
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
11:45

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.0K
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.3K
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare facility design
  • Simulation-based testing
  • Evidence-based design

Background:

  • Simulation-based hospital design testing (SbHDT) ensures architectural designs support safe, high-quality, and efficient care delivery.
  • It goes beyond basic building code compliance to proactively identify potential issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the financial impact of SbHDT, specifically focusing on cost avoidance.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of SbHDT in mitigating safety concerns and improving hospital design.

Main Methods:

  • SbHDT was applied during the design of a new 400+ bed children's hospital, focusing on 15 clinical areas.
  • Latent conditions were identified, and architectural modifications were made to resolve them before construction.
  • The cost of these modifications was documented to calculate total cost avoidance.

Main Results:

  • The simulation cost $1.6M, representing 0.01% of the total project cost.
  • 722 latent conditions were identified, with 57% mitigated through design changes.
  • $90 million in costs were avoided, and 28% of latent conditions would have been prohibitively expensive to fix post-construction.

Conclusions:

  • SbHDT is financially practical, significantly impacting cost avoidance in healthcare facility design.
  • It improves clinical care, optimizes safety, and maximizes investment through evidence-based design.
  • While SbHDT has upfront costs, it leads to long-term savings by avoiding expenses related to safety threats and operational inefficiencies.