Effect of digital noise-reduction processing on subcortical speech encoding and relationship to behavioral outcomes
Subong Kim1, Mary Schroeder2, Hari M Bharadwaj3
1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA.
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|November 18, 2024
Summary
Individual differences in noise reduction (NR) benefits are linked to brainstem speech encoding. Objective brainstem measures show sensitivity to NR processing and correlate with behavioral outcomes, suggesting a physiological basis for NR effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Audiology
- Speech Processing
Background:
- Perceptual benefits of digital noise reduction (NR) vary significantly across individuals.
- Individual differences in noise tolerance and sensitivity to NR-induced distortions are not well understood physiologically.
- The subcortical encoding of speech in the auditory pathway is a potential area for investigating these individual differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop objective measures of speech encoding in the ascending auditory pathway.
- To assess if these measures can predict individual noise tolerance and sensitivity to NR-processed speech.
- To explore the physiological basis of individual variability in the benefits of NR.
Main Methods:
- Utilized speech-evoked brainstem responses (sEBRs) to the syllable /da/ as objective measures.
- Analyzed sEBRs for sensitivity to added noise and NR processing.
- Quantified NR effects using response-to-response correlation metrics and spectral amplitude ratios for consonant and vowel portions, respectively.
- Examined the correlation between fundamental frequency (f0) amplitude ratios and behavioral accuracy with NR.
Main Results:
- Speech-evoked brainstem responses were sensitive to both noise addition and NR processing.
- NR effects on consonant and vowel encoding were robustly quantified.
- f0 amplitude ratios between conditions showed a significant correlation with behavioral accuracy in NR conditions.
- These findings indicate that brainstem responses can objectively reflect NR effects on speech encoding.
Conclusions:
- Investigating NR effects on bottom-up speech encoding using brainstem measures is feasible.
- Individual subcortical encoding of NR-processed speech may predict individual behavioral outcomes.
- Brainstem response metrics offer a promising avenue for understanding individual differences in NR effectiveness.


