Cardioversion versus ablation versus 'pace and ablate' for persistent atrial fibrillation in older patients

Our objective was to compare the efficacy of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation versus permanent pacemaker (PPM) with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) versus direct current cardioversion (DCCV) for persistent AF in patients ≥65 years old. Seventy-seven patients (aged 66-86, mean 75.4 years) with persistent AF were randomised (1:1:1) to AF ablation + amiodarone (± DCCV), PPM with AVNA (+DCCV) or DCCV + amiodarone. The primary end point was persistent AF recurrence, measured with an implanted cardiac monitor or PPM. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed at baseline and six months. Symptom questionnaires were completed monthly. Follow-up was 12 months. The primary end point occurred in fewer patients following AF ablation + amiodarone than DCCV + amiodarone (seven patients, 28% vs. 15 patients, 60%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.559, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.293 to 1.065, p=0.073) with no differences between DCCV + amiodarone and PPM with AVNA (HR 0.990, 95%CI 0.539 to 1.818, p=0.973). AF ablation + amiodarone resulted in a lower AF burden at 12 months compared with DCCV + amiodarone (17.0 ± 37.9% vs. 61.7 ± 48.6%, p<0.0001). Modified European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom class improved in all patients (baseline 2.4 ± 0.495 vs. 12-month follow-up 1.84 ± 0.081, p=0.00001). Six-month CPET demonstrated a higher VO₂ peak in sinus rhythm (SR) compared with baseline in AF (12.1 ± 4.2 ml/kg/min at baseline to 15.3 ± 4.2 ml/kg/min at six months, p=0.013). In conclusion, in older patients with persistent AF, ablation + amiodarone resulted in a lower AF burden at 12 months than DCCV + amiodarone. There was a non-significant trend toward reduced recurrence of devicedetected persistent AF episodes. All therapies improved symptoms despite DCCV restoring SR in <50% of patients at 12 months. CPET demonstrated improved VO₂ peak with SR restoration.