Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Establishment of a Novel Risk Stratification System Integrating Clinical and Pathological Parameters for
Haiying Wu1, Lin Huang1, Xiangtong Chen1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Background:
Highly heterogeneity and inconsistency in terms of prognosis are widely identified for early-stage cervical cancer (esCC). Herein, we aim to investigate for an intuitional risk stratification model for better prognostication and decision-making in combination with clinical and pathological variables.
Methods:
We enrolled 2071 CC patients with preoperative biopsy-confirmed and clinically diagnosed with FIGO stage IA-IIA who received radical hysterectomy from 2013 to 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to the training set (n = 1450) and internal validation set (n = 621), in a ratio of 7:3. We used recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to develop a risk stratification model and assessed the ability of discrimination and calibration of the RPA-derived model. The performances of the model were compared with the conventional FIGO 2018 and 9th edition T or N stage classifications.
Results:
RPA divided patients into four risk groups with distinct survival: 5-year OS for RPA I to IV were 98%, 95%, 85.5%, and 64.2%, respectively, in training cohort; and 99.5%, 93.2%, 85%, and 68.3% in internal validation cohort (log-rank p < 0.001). Calibration curves confirmed that the RPA-predicted survivals were in good agreement with the actual survivals. The RPA model outperformed the existing staging systems, with highest AUC for OS (training: 0.778 vs. 0.6-0.717; internal validation: 0.772 vs. 0.595-0.704; all p < 0.05), and C-index for OS (training: 0.768 vs. 0.598-0.707; internal validation: 0.741 vs. 0.583-0.676; all p < 0.05). Importantly, there were associations between RPA groups and the efficacy of treatment regimens. No obvious discrepancy was observed among different treatment modalities in RPA I (p = 0.922), whereas significant survival improvements were identified in patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in RPA II-IV (p value were 0.028, 0.036, and 0.024, respectively).
Conclusion:
We presented a validated novel clinicopathological risk stratification signature for robust prognostication of esCC, which may be used for streamlining treatment strategies.
