Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

559
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
559
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

937
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
937
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

998
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
998
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

917
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
917
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

1.5K
The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shared decision-making in ongoing psychotherapy: Negotiating frames, preferences and meaning.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
Same author

Involving patient partners as appraisers of shared decision making: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.

Research involvement and engagement·2026
Same author

Updated International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS version 5.0): modified Delphi, evidence informed consensus process.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Constitutional methylation of the MLH1 promoter: a case series including tumors not typically caused by Lynch Syndrome.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026
Same author

Exploration of between-hospital variation and the basis for decision making in management of malignant colorectal polyps- a Danish population-based study.

World journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Effect of an in-consult patient decision aid on decisional quality and involvement for patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial.

Acta orthopaedica·2026
Same journal

Invaders taking over-Mollusc faunal change in volcanic barrier lakes of the Albertine Rift biodiversity hotspot.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

AI-driven molecular diversification and ligand-based optimization of macitentan derivatives targeting VEGFR1 and endothelin signaling pathways.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Performance patterns and records in the world aquatics masters championships: Where do the most frequently represented nations among the top-ten masters swimmers come from?

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Modeling diurnal Temperature-Rainfall relationships under multicollinearity using PLS-SEM: A case study of Ghana.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Organizational culture, social capital, and emergency capacity in primary healthcare institutions: A cross-sectional structural equation modeling study comparing ordinary and older communities.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Impact of kidney function on the metabolome in the general population.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
06:40

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management

Published on: June 29, 2019

6.6K

"Developing the tool SDM:KOMPASS. Supporting shared decision making implementation processes".

Lea Lund1,2, Dorte Gilså Hansen1,2, Lisa Korsbek3

  • 1Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.

Plos One
|November 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new tool, SDM:KOMPASS, supports shared decision-making (SDM) implementation in hospitals. This quality improvement initiative developed a tool to aid goal-setting and progress visualization for better patient care.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
05:35

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management

Published on: January 19, 2024

713
Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
07:13

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
06:40

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management

Published on: June 29, 2019

6.6K
Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
05:35

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management

Published on: January 19, 2024

713
Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
07:13

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Engagement Strategies
  • Clinical Practice Implementation

Background:

  • Shared decision-making (SDM) improves patient engagement and satisfaction but faces implementation challenges in clinical practice.
  • A supportive tool is needed to facilitate the integration of SDM into routine hospital settings.
  • Existing barriers to SDM adoption necessitate innovative solutions for healthcare organizations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the development of a generic tool, SDM:KOMPASS, designed to support SDM implementation in hospitals.
  • To facilitate the visualization of formative progress and goal-setting for SDM initiatives.
  • To assess the perceived usability and feasibility of the SDM:KOMPASS tool among healthcare professionals and patients.

Main Methods:

  • A six-step development process was employed to create the SDM:KOMPASS tool.
  • Qualitative methods including observations and interviews (individual and focus groups) were used.
  • A 10-item quantitative survey assessed immediate user attitudes, with N=20 purposefully sampled participants (healthcare professionals and patients).

Main Results:

  • The SDM:KOMPASS tool was developed to enhance the manageability, goal-setting, and focus of SDM implementation.
  • Participants found the tool potentially valuable, beneficial, and feasible for embedding SDM in somatic and mental hospital departments.
  • The tool's readability, clarity, content, and perceived usability were evaluated, showing promise but noting its comprehensiveness.

Conclusions:

  • SDM:KOMPASS is a potentially valuable resource for healthcare organizations aiming to embed shared decision-making into routine practice.
  • The tool's structured development process indicates its potential to improve SDM implementation efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Further alpha testing in clinical practice is recommended to validate the tool's usability and impact.