Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

08:42
Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
12.0K
Monkeys overestimate connected arrays in a relative quantity task: A reverse connectedness illusion.
Michael J Beran1, Maisy D Englund2, Elizabeth L Haseltine2
1Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. mberan1@gsu.edu.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|November 18, 2024
Summary
Monkeys do not exhibit the human "connectedness illusion" for quantity judgments. Instead, monkeys perceive connected items as more numerous, unlike humans who underestimate them.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Comparative cognition
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Species exhibit consistent quantity judgments, influenced by Weber's Law and the ratio effect.
- Perceptual illusions, like the human connectedness illusion, reveal insights into quantity representation.
- The connectedness illusion causes underestimation of item quantity when elements are connected.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the connectedness illusion is present in non-human primates.
- To compare quantity judgments between humans and rhesus macaque and capuchin monkeys.
- To explore cross-species differences in perceptual biases related to quantity.
Main Methods:
- Pre-registered study design to ensure scientific rigor.
- Testing rhesus macaque and capuchin monkeys on quantity discrimination tasks.
- Comparing monkey responses to stimuli with and without connected items.
Main Results:
- Monkeys demonstrated a bias opposite to the human connectedness illusion.
- Monkeys consistently preferred arrays with connected items, perceiving them as more numerous.
- This indicates a significant difference in quantity perception between humans and these monkey species.
Conclusions:
- The connectedness illusion, as observed in humans, is not replicated in rhesus macaques and capuchin monkeys.
- Monkeys may have distinct mechanisms for quantity representation compared to humans.
- Further research is needed to understand the evolutionary and cognitive underpinnings of these cross-species differences.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K

