Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Gastric Mucosa Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis for Detecting Helicobacter pylori and Antibiotic Resistance
Published on: March 7, 2025
The Incidence and Methods for Detecting Aspirin Resistance in Pediatric Patients
Hansamon Poparn1,2, Yaowaree Kittikalayawong1,2, Piti Techavichit1,2
1Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Insights
Aspirin resistance is uncommon in Thai children, affecting only 2.7%. Routine screening is not recommended, but point-of-care tests like PFA-200 may aid in specific cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Hematology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Aspirin resistance can lead to severe complications like myocardial infarction or stroke, particularly in children.
- Assessing aspirin resistance in pediatric populations is infrequent, despite its clinical significance.
- Standard aggregometry is time-consuming, necessitating evaluation of rapid point-of-care alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of aspirin resistance in Thai children.
- To compare the efficacy of point-of-care platelet function analyzer (PFA-200) and bleeding time (BT) tests against standard impedance aggregometry (IA).
- To evaluate the role of routine aspirin resistance screening in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- A single-center cross-sectional study involving 37 Thai children (≤15 years) receiving aspirin.
- Comparison of platelet function analyzer (PFA-200) and bedside bleeding time (BT) with standard whole blood impedance aggregometry (IA).
- Aspirin resistance defined by IA (>5 ohms), PFA-200 (<180 seconds), and BT (≤7 minutes).
Main Results:
- Aspirin resistance was confirmed in 2.7% of pediatric patients via IA.
- PFA-200 demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity, outperforming BT (36.1% specificity).
- PFA-200 and BT showed poor agreement with IA (McNemar P < 0.05, kappa values 0.215 and 0.030).
Conclusions:
- Aspirin resistance is rare in Thai children.
- Routine screening for aspirin resistance is generally not advised; consider it for recurrent thrombosis or resistant risk factors.
- PFA-200 shows potential as a point-of-care screening tool for pediatric aspirin resistance, unlike bedside BT.
Abstract:
Since aspirin resistance is rarely assessed in pediatric patients and thrombosis might cause damage in vital organs, such as the myocardium or brain, we aimed to determine its incidence and the pivotal role of routine screening. The point-of-care test by platelet function analyzer (PFA-200) and bedside bleeding time (BT) was compared to standard whole blood impedance aggregometry (IA), the time-consuming and sophisticated assays. This single-center cross-sectional study was investigated in Thai children (≤15 years). All participants received at least five-day administrations of aspirin (3 to 5 mg/kg/day or equivalent to a single tablet of 81 mg) for any prior thrombotic risks. Platelet aggregation >5 ohms on IA with 0.5 mM arachidonic acid, closure time <180 seconds on collagen/epinephrine PFA-200, and modified Ivy BT ≤7 minutes, defined resistance. Of 37 patients, 2.7% had confirmed aspirin resistance to IA. Despite the 100% sensitivity, PFA-200 showed higher specificity than BT (83.3% vs 36.1%). However, both were not comparable (exact McNemar P < 0.05), with a slight/fair reliability (ĸ=0.215 vs ĸ=0.030 respectively). Aspirin resistance is uncommon in Thai children. Routine screening is discouraged but recommended only in cases with recurrent thrombosis despite good aspirin compliance or the presence of resistant risk factors. Although the gold standard IA could not be replaced, the rapid assay of PFA-200, not bedside BT, can potentially be considered a point-of-care alternative screening test to detect aspirin resistance in children.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview

