Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach
Published on: February 14, 2014
Performance of a Short Version of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12) to Detect Cognitive Impairment
M Manjavong1, A Diaz, M T Ashford
1Rachel L. Nosheny, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement Street (114M), San Francisco, CA 94121, Tel: 650-468-0619, Fax: 415-668-2864,
Background:
The Everyday Cognition (ECog) 12-item scale, a functional decline measurement, can distinguish dementia from cognitively unimpaired (CU). Limited data compare ECog-12 performance by raters (self vs. informant) and scoring systems (average numeric vs. categorical grouping) to differentiate cognitive statuses.
Objectives:
To evaluate the performance of ECog-12 in differentiation cognitive statuses.
Design:
A cross-sectional diagnostic test study.
Setting And Participants:
Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study are analyzed. Participants were aged 55-90 years old divided into subgroups based on diagnostic criteria.
Measurements:
We evaluated ECog-12 performance across different diagnostic groups, such as CU vs cognitive impairment (CI; mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia), and the association between ECog-12 and CI. This procedure was repeated for self- and partner (informant)-reports. Additionally, types of ECog scores were also assessed, where an average ECog score was calculated (continuous numeric) as well as a categorical grouping ("any occasional declined" or "any consistently declined") based on item-level responses to ECog questions.
Results:
ECog-12 cut-off scores of 1.36 (self-reported) and 1.45 (partner-reported) distinguish CU from CI with AUC 0.7 and 0.78, respectively. Adding a memory-concern question improved self-reported-ECog AUC to 0.79. Self- and partner-reported "consistently-declined" ECog-12 categorical grouping provided AUC 0.69 and 0.78. The study partner reported ECog-12 showed a greater association with CI than self-reported, with odds ratios of 35.45 and 8.79, respectively.
Conclusion:
Study partner-reported ECog scores performed better than self-reported ECog-12 in differentiating cognitive statuses, and a higher study partner reported ECog score was a higher prognostic risk for CI. A memory concern question could enhance self-reported ECog-12 performance. This further emphasizes the need to obtain data from study partners for research and clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Visual Agnosia
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Self-Concept
Infancy and Emerging Recognition
During infancy, self-concept is virtually nonexistent. Babies do not distinguish themselves as separate entities and often mistake their...
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

