Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Using Large Language Models to Abstract Complex Social Determinants of Health From Original and Deidentified Medical
Alexandra Ralevski1,2, Nadaa Taiyab3, Michael Nossal2
1Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Background:
Social determinants of health (SDoH) such as housing insecurity are known to be intricately linked to patients' health status. More efficient methods for abstracting structured data on SDoH can help accelerate the inclusion of exposome variables in biomedical research and support health care systems in identifying patients who could benefit from proactive outreach. Large language models (LLMs) developed from Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) have shown potential for performing complex abstraction tasks on unstructured clinical notes.
Objective:
Here, we assess the performance of GPTs on identifying temporal aspects of housing insecurity and compare results between both original and deidentified notes.
Methods:
We compared the ability of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to identify instances of both current and past housing instability, as well as general housing status, from 25,217 notes from 795 pregnant women. Results were compared with manual abstraction, a named entity recognition model, and regular expressions.
Results:
Compared with GPT-3.5 and the named entity recognition model, GPT-4 had the highest performance and had a much higher recall (0.924) than human abstractors (0.702) in identifying patients experiencing current or past housing instability, although precision was lower (0.850) compared with human abstractors (0.971). GPT-4's precision improved slightly (0.936 original, 0.939 deidentified) on deidentified versions of the same notes, while recall dropped (0.781 original, 0.704 deidentified).
Conclusions:
This work demonstrates that while manual abstraction is likely to yield slightly more accurate results overall, LLMs can provide a scalable, cost-effective solution with the advantage of greater recall. This could support semiautomated abstraction, but given the potential risk for harm, human review would be essential before using results for any patient engagement or care decisions. Furthermore, recall was lower when notes were deidentified prior to LLM abstraction.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Longitudinal Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...