Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Published on: January 25, 2016
Intrasubject variability in potential early markers of sensorineural hearing damage
Nele De Poortere1, Sarineh Keshishzadeh2, Hannah Keppler1,3
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences-Audiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
This study found that while pure-tone audiometry is reliable for detecting sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), speech tests show learning effects. Envelope following responses (EFRs) are more reliable EEG biomarkers for cochlear synaptopathy than auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Audiology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Noninvasive early markers for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are needed, but studies evaluating test-retest reliability of multiple measures are scarce.
- A standardized clinical protocol for robust early SNHL markers is currently elusive.
- Cochlear synaptopathy (CS) is an early indicator of SNHL, necessitating reliable detection methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the intra-subject variability of potential electroencephalogram (EEG) biomarkers for CS and other SNHL markers.
- To compare the test-retest reliability of various auditory measures in normal-hearing young adults.
- To identify robust, noninvasive markers for early SNHL detection.
Main Methods:
- Fifteen normal-hearing young adults participated in repeated measures.
- Evaluated measures included extended high-frequency pure-tone audiometry, speech-in-noise intelligibility, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), envelope following responses (EFRs), and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs).
- Analyzed intra-subject variability and test-retest reliability across different measurement techniques and criteria.
Main Results:
- Pure-tone audiometry demonstrated high reliability.
- Speech-in-noise testing showed a significant learning effect.
- Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) reliability varied based on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) criteria and measurement conditions.
- Envelope following responses (EFRs) exhibited superior test-retest reliability compared to auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes.
Conclusions:
- Careful interpretation of noninvasive SNHL measures is crucial.
- Tonal audiometry is robust, but speech audiometry has a confounding learning effect.
- DPOAE reliability is sensitive to measurement techniques and ear probe consistency.
- EFRs are preferable to ABR amplitudes as potential EEG biomarkers for cochlear synaptopathy based on this study's findings.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
07:13Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Neural Regulation
The Cochlea