Delving into Macrolide Binding Affinities and Associated Structural Modulations in Erythromycin Esterase C: Insights

Abhishek Bera1, Pritish Joshi1, Niladri Patra1

  • 1Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Dhanbad 826004, India.

Insights

Erythromycin esterase C (EreC) binds to macrolide antibiotics like azithromycin and clarithromycin more strongly than erythromycin. This interaction involves key hydrophobic residues and a "Venus flytrap"-like mechanism for resistance.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Macrolide antibiotics are crucial in treating bacterial infections.
  • Pathogenic bacteria evolve antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mechanisms, including macrolide esterases.
  • Erythromycin esterase C (EreC) detoxifies macrolides by hydrolyzing their lactone ring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interactions and conformational dynamics between EreC and three FDA-approved macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.
  • To elucidate the binding mechanisms and affinities of these macrolides to EreC.
  • To understand the structural basis of macrolide resistance mediated by EreC.

Main Methods:

  • Classical molecular dynamics simulations.
  • Absolute binding free energy calculations using the Streamlined Alchemical Free Energy Perturbation (SAFEP) protocol.
  • 2D well-tempered metadynamics simulations and graph theory-based eigenvector centrality analyses.

Main Results:

  • Hydrophobic interactions within the EreC binding cleft and minor lobe fluctuations are critical for macrolide binding.
  • In silico alanine scanning identified PHE248, MET333, and PHE344 as key hydrophobic residues for macrolide binding.
  • Azithromycin and clarithromycin exhibit higher binding affinities to EreC compared to erythromycin.
  • A metastable "semiopen" state was observed during EreC's active loop closure, resembling a "Venus flytrap" mechanism, triggered by HIS289 conformational changes.

Conclusions:

  • EreC employs hydrophobic interactions and dynamic structural changes for macrolide binding and hydrolysis.
  • The binding affinity differences suggest varying susceptibility of macrolides to EreC-mediated resistance.
  • The identified "Venus flytrap"-like mechanism provides insights into the conformational dynamics of EreC in response to macrolide binding.