Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

Effects of feedback

Effects of feedback

Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The efficacy and potential mechanism of the acupuncture treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from animal models.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2025

Same author

Perceptual load modulates the delta oscillation and the contribution of delta oscillation to reward positivity during feedback valence encoding.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Same author

KLF7 orchestrates hippocampal development through neurogenesis and Draxin-mediated neuronal migration.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2025

Same author

Kartagener syndrome combined with small cell lung cancer: A case report and literature review.

Experimental and therapeutic medicine·2025

Same author

Protective effect of melatonin against metabolic disorders and neuropsychiatric injuries in type 2 diabetes mellitus mice.

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology·2024

Same author

Dynamic Changes in Neuroglial Reaction and Tissue Repair after Photothrombotic Stroke in Neonatal Mouse.

Brain sciences·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence.

Wenqi Song¹, Rixin Qi¹, Lingyao Tong²

¹School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.

|November 20, 2024

Summary

Brain activity during learning primarily reflects positive feedback, not negative feedback. Researchers found reward positivity (RewP) for gains but no specific electrophysiological signals for losses, suggesting reward processing dominates neural responses.

Keywords:

Delta oscillation Event-related potentials (ERPs)Feedback (outcome) processing Reward positivity (RewP)Time-frequency analysis

More Related Videos

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Decision Making

Background:

Reinforcement learning involves processing both positive and negative feedback.
The electrophysiological correlates of positive feedback, such as reward positivity (RewP), are known.
Electrophysiological indicators for negative feedback processing remain elusive.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate specific neural responses to gain and loss processing during reinforcement learning.
To differentiate electrophysiological markers for positive versus negative feedback.
To address the gap in understanding neural mechanisms of loss processing.

Main Methods:

Utilized a modified gambling task with gain processing-advantaged (GA) and loss processing-advantaged (LA) contexts.
Employed electroencephalography (EEG) to record neural activity.
Applied time-domain and time-frequency analyses to EEG data.

Main Results:

Identified RewP and delta oscillations associated with gain feedback in the GA context.
Observed no specific negative components or electrophysiological signals for loss processing.
Confirmed the dominance of reward processing signals even in loss-inducing conditions.

Conclusions:

Electrophysiological responses during feedback evaluation are predominantly driven by reward processing.
Negative feedback processing may not elicit distinct, detectable electrophysiological signals with current methods.
The brain's evaluation system appears biased towards processing positive outcomes over negative ones.