Patient-reported performance status and postoperative complications in elective colorectal cancer surgery

  • 0Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. heyi@regionsjaelland.dk.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Patient-reported performance status (prPS) shows poor agreement with surgeon-reported performance status (srPS) in colorectal cancer surgery. Both prPS and srPS correlate with postoperative complications, with srPS showing a slightly stronger link.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Patient Outcomes Research

Background

  • Accurate assessment of patient performance status (PS) is crucial for surgical decision-making in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
  • Discrepancies between patient-reported performance status (prPS) and surgeon-reported performance status (srPS) may impact surgical suitability and outcomes.
  • Understanding the concordance and correlation of these assessments with postoperative complications is vital for optimizing patient care.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To evaluate the concordance between prPS and srPS in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery.
  • To assess the correlation between srPS, prPS, and 30-day postoperative complications.
  • To determine if prPS can assist surgeons in preoperative decision-making.

Main Methods

  • A retrospective analysis of 524 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
  • Collection of prPS via questionnaires and srPS from surgical records.
  • Utilizing linearly weighted kappa statistics for agreement assessment and rank-biserial correlation for complication analysis.

Main Results

  • A 71% concordance was observed between prPS and srPS, with significant disagreement in nearly one-third of cases.
  • Both prPS and srPS correlated significantly with overall postoperative complications, minor surgical complications, and medical complications.
  • srPS showed a stronger correlation with postoperative complications, particularly major surgical complications, compared to prPS.

Conclusions

  • The agreement between patient-reported and surgeon-reported performance status is poor in colorectal cancer surgery.
  • Both patient and surgeon assessments of performance status are associated with postoperative complications.
  • Surgeon-reported performance status demonstrates a slightly higher predictive value for complications than patient-reported status.

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy 01:26

50

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy 01:25

57

The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:

Ascending Colon: Rises upward on the right side of the abdomen.
Transverse Colon: Stretches from the ascending colon across the body to the left side.
Descending Colon: Travels...

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management 01:29

66

Diagnosing and managing appendicitis requires a structured and comprehensive approach that spans from initial assessment to postoperative care. Here is an overview of the process:
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy 01:29

69

An Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a diagnostic procedure in which an endoscopist uses a flexible, lighted endoscope to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The procedure includes visualizing the oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine, the duodenum.
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:

Diagnose conditions such as ulcers, GERD, celiac disease, and cancers.
Perform biopsies to collect small tissue samples for cancer or celiac disease...