Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid bacterial diagnostics at the point of care: emerging electrochemical and Raman-based approaches.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

3D nanoprinted hollow-core light cages for fiber-interfaced on-chip gas absorption spectroscopy.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Comprehensive study of ultrathin TiN films by ALD: influence of film thickness and substrate on composition, structure, sheet resistance and durability.

Nanoscale advances·2026
Same author

The Faraday Scalpel: Electrochemical Nerve Lesioning Mechanisms Studied in Invertebrate Models.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Low-power microfluidic RT-LAMP system with real-time fluorescence detection for portable nucleic acid testing.

Mikrochimica acta·2025
Same author

Affordable method for channel geometry-specific flow control in microfluidics without commercial pumps.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

A Microfluidic Chip for the Versatile Chemical Analysis of Single Cells
15:41

A Microfluidic Chip for the Versatile Chemical Analysis of Single Cells

Published on: October 15, 2013

14.9K

Microfluidics chips fabrication techniques comparison.

Xiaocheng Liu1, Antao Sun1, Jan Brodský2

  • 1Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Micro and Nano Systems for Aerospace, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, 127 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.

Scientific Reports
|November 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares microfluidic chip fabrication methods for rapid diagnostics, like those needed during the COVID-19 pandemic. It analyzes techniques for material challenges, cost, and thermal properties essential for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) devices.

More Related Videos

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays
09:58

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays

Published on: June 23, 2022

2.1K
One-Step Approach to Fabricating Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels of Different Geometric Sections by Sequential Wet Etching Processes
08:31

One-Step Approach to Fabricating Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels of Different Geometric Sections by Sequential Wet Etching Processes

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

A Microfluidic Chip for the Versatile Chemical Analysis of Single Cells
15:41

A Microfluidic Chip for the Versatile Chemical Analysis of Single Cells

Published on: October 15, 2013

14.9K
Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays
09:58

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays

Published on: June 23, 2022

2.1K
One-Step Approach to Fabricating Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels of Different Geometric Sections by Sequential Wet Etching Processes
08:31

One-Step Approach to Fabricating Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels of Different Geometric Sections by Sequential Wet Etching Processes

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Microfluidics

Background:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for rapid diagnostic tools.
  • Microfluidic chips offer potential for point-of-care diagnostics due to their small size and efficiency.
  • Fabrication techniques significantly impact microfluidic device performance and scalability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare various microfluidic chip fabrication methods.
  • To assess their suitability for urgent diagnostic applications.
  • To analyze fabrication complexity, material challenges, and thermal properties.

Main Methods:

  • Computer numerical control (CNC) milling of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA).
  • Soft lithography for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) devices.
  • Xurography for glass-glass chips.
  • Micromachining for silicon-glass chips.

Main Results:

  • Each method presents unique trade-offs in terms of fabrication complexity, cost-efficiency, and design flexibility.
  • Thermal properties, including heating and cooling rates, vary significantly between techniques, impacting polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performance.
  • Material challenges and device durability are critical considerations for clinical translation.

Conclusions:

  • Selecting the appropriate microfluidic chip fabrication method is crucial for optimizing device functionality, durability, and production efficiency.
  • Advanced fabrication techniques are essential for developing robust microfluidic devices for healthcare and research.
  • This comparative analysis provides guidance for the development of next-generation diagnostic platforms.