Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Discovery: Overview01:26

Drug Discovery: Overview

7.5K
Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...
7.5K
Targets for Drug Action: Overview01:26

Targets for Drug Action: Overview

6.0K
Drugs target macromolecules to modify ongoing cellular processes. Primary drug targets include receptors, ion channels, transporters, and enzymes.
Receptors are either membrane-spanning or intracellular proteins, which upon binding a ligand, get activated and transmit the signal downstream to elicit a response. Drugs bind receptors, either mimicking the action of endogenous ligands or blocking the receptor activity to bring about a modified response. Nearly 35% of approved drugs target the G...
6.0K
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

595
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
595
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.7K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.7K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.5K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.5K
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods01:22

Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods

132
Determining protein-drug binding can be achieved through indirect and direct methods, each providing valuable insights into the interaction between proteins and drugs.
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
132

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complex I drives glutamine-dependent TCA cycle to support viability of MYC<sup>high</sup> breast cancer cells.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Predicting drug combination response surfaces.

npj drug discovery·2026
Same author

Standardized workflow enables reproducibility of drug synergism detection: Results from a multi-center in vitro ring test on complex drug combinations in pancreatic cancer models.

Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie·2026
Same author

A multi-center study on the consistency of drug sensitivity testing in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Multimodal immunopharmacologic screens identify drugs rewiring the cancer-immune interface.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Preclinical models of hepatosplenic γδ T-cell lymphoma with an activating STAT5B mutation display sensitivity to JAK inhibitor upadacitinib.

HemaSphere·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.4K

Validation guidelines for drug-target prediction methods.

Ziaurrehman Tanoli1,2, Aron Schulman1, Tero Aittokallio1,2,3,4

  • 1Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
|November 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computational methods predict drug-target interactions, crucial for drug discovery. Increased research since 2014 shows docking and regression are common, but experimental validation remains rare and is recommended for biological relevance.

Keywords:
Drug-target interaction predictioncomputational validationdrug repurposingexperimental validationtarget activity mapping

More Related Videos

A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction
00:05

A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction

Published on: August 27, 2019

16.2K
Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
08:31

Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions

Published on: December 1, 2020

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.4K
A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction
00:05

A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction

Published on: August 27, 2019

16.2K
Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
08:31

Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions

Published on: December 1, 2020

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Pharmacology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Drug-target interactions are key for drug discovery and repurposing, informing mechanisms of action and optimizing drug profiles.
  • Computational methods are widely used to predict these interactions, but validation methods vary significantly.
  • Understanding the evolution of these methods and their validation is crucial for advancing drug discovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the trends in computational drug-target interaction prediction methods over the past decade.
  • To investigate the evolution of validation strategies and performance metrics in this field.
  • To identify prevalent experimental validation protocols and recommend future directions.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature review of 3,286 articles on drug-target interaction prediction published in the last 10 years.
  • Natural language processing for automated abstract classification and trend analysis.
  • Manual analysis of 259 studies that included experimental validation of computational predictions.

Main Results:

  • A significant increase in publications on drug-target interaction prediction since 2014.
  • Docking and regression are the most frequently utilized computational techniques.
  • Cross-validation is a common computational validation strategy, but experimental validation is infrequent.
  • Multiple, orthogonal validation strategies are recommended for computational predictions.

Conclusions:

  • The field of computational drug-target interaction prediction has grown substantially, with established computational methods and validation approaches.
  • There is a critical need for more routine and rigorous experimental validation to confirm the biological relevance of computational predictions.
  • Standardized reporting of diverse validation strategies is essential for reliable drug discovery and repurposing efforts.