Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

05:21
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
Published on: January 7, 2019
7.9K
Calibrating workers' trust in intelligent automated systems
Gale M Lucas1, Burcin Becerik-Gerber2, Shawn C Roll3
1USC Institute for Creative Technologies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Patterns (New York, N.Y.)
|November 21, 2024
Summary
This study reevaluates calibrated trust in automation, updating its definition for modern, intelligent systems. It emphasizes accurate trust judgments in the evolving automated workplace.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Automation and Robotics
- Organizational Psychology
Background:
- The increasing prevalence of automation necessitates a critical understanding of trust in these systems.
- Existing models of trust in automation were developed for less intelligent machines, limiting their applicability to current advanced technologies.
- Modern automation exhibits enhanced intelligence and interactive capabilities, requiring a revised framework for trust calibration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reevaluate and update the general understanding of calibrated trust in automation.
- To apply this updated understanding to the context of worker trust in workplace automation.
- To incorporate the nuances of highly intelligent and interactive automated systems into trust models.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of seminal trust in automation models.
- Conceptual analysis of evolving automation capabilities and their impact on trust.
- Theoretical revision of the concept of calibrated trust in automation.
Main Results:
- Identified limitations of existing trust models for contemporary intelligent automation.
- Proposed an updated definition of calibrated trust in automation that accommodates advanced AI and interactive systems.
- Highlighted the need for new frameworks to assess and manage trust in human-automation collaboration.
Conclusions:
- The concept of calibrated trust in automation requires revision to account for increasingly intelligent and interactive automated systems.
- Accurate trust calibration is crucial for effective human-automation collaboration in the modern workplace.
- Further research is needed to develop and validate new models for trust in advanced automation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
Instrument Calibration
152
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
152
Obedience
32.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.8K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.5K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.5K
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K

