Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Chronological Changes in Embolization for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Impact of Endovascular Treatment
Yoshiro Ito1,2, Yuji Matsumaru1,2, Hisayuki Hosoo1,2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Objective:
Although embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) is widely performed as an adjunctive therapy before microsurgery or radiosurgery, there is no high-level evidence to ascertain its effectiveness. However, the technology for endovascular devices has improved. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the chronological changes in AVM embolization due to advances in endovascular treatment devices.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 24 patients who underwent 31 embolization procedures between January 2018 and August 2023. Embolization plus microsurgery, embolization plus radiosurgery, and embolization alone were performed in 15 (62.5%) patients and 21 embolization procedures, 2 (8.3%) patients and 2 procedures, and 7 (29.2%) patients and 8 procedures, respectively. We assessed chronological changes in endovascular treatment devices and evaluated clinical outcomes (ideal position of microcatheter, vessel perforations, symptomatic complications) from January 2018 to December 2020 and from January 2021 to August 2023 based on the chronological changes in endovascular treatment devices.
Results:
Intermediate catheters were employed in 29 (93.5%) procedures. Brands of intermediate catheters and microcatheters significantly changed around 2021. No differences were observed in the embolic materials. The ideal position of the microcatheter was achieved significantly more in 2021-2023 than in 2018-2020 (72.1% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.04). Vessel perforation by microcatheters in 2018-2020 and 2021-2023 occurred in 3 (18.8%) and 1 (6.7%) procedures (p = 0.32), respectively. Symptomatic complications in 2018-2020 and 2021-2023 occurred in 3 (18.8%) and 0 (p = 0.08) procedures, respectively. Complete obliteration was achieved in 18 of 24 patients (75.0%). Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) were observed in 20 of 24 (83.3%) patients at the final follow-up.
Conclusion:
The advancement in endovascular devices for AVM has enabled effective and safe embolization, potentially enhancing the outcomes of microsurgical interventions.
More Related Videos
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction