Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Structural Design and Manufacturing of a Cruiser Class Solar Vehicle
Published on: January 30, 2019
Stability and agility trade-offs in spring-wing systems
James Lynch1, Ethan S Wold2, Jeff Gau3
1Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
None:
Flying insects are thought to achieve energy-efficient flapping flight by storing and releasing elastic energy in their muscles, tendons, and thorax. However, 'spring-wing' flight systems consisting of elastic elements coupled to nonlinear, unsteady aerodynamic forces present possible challenges to generating stable and responsive wing motion. The energetic efficiency from resonance in insect flight is tied to the Weis-Fogh number (N), which is the ratio of peak inertial force to aerodynamic force. In this paper, we present experiments and modeling to study how resonance efficiency (which increases withN) influences the control responsiveness and perturbation resistance of flapping wingbeats. In our first experiments, we provide a step change in the input forcing amplitude to a series-elastic spring-wing system and observe the response time of the wing amplitude increase. In our second experiments we provide an external fluid flow directed at the flapping wing and study the perturbed steady-state wing motion. We evaluate both experiments across Weis-Fogh numbers from1
Related Concept Videos
Stability of structures
Stability of Equilibrium Configuration: Problem Solving
Problem-solving in the context of the stability of equilibrium configuration...
Euler's Formula to Columns: Problem Solving
The system comprises two vertical rigid bars, AB and BC,...
Pole and System Stability
Simple poles are unique roots of the denominator polynomial. Each simple pole corresponds to a distinct solution to the system's characteristic equation, typically resulting in exponential decay terms in the system's...
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Frequency of Spring-Mass System
Consider a block on a spring on a frictionless surface. There...

