Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2025

Digital Spatial Profiling for Characterization of the Microenvironment in Adult-Type Diffusely Infiltrating Glioma
Published on: September 13, 2022
Immune checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: emerging science, clinical advances, and future directions
Aarav Badani1,2, Ahmad Ozair3, Mustafa Khasraw4
1Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Abstract:
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults, continues to have a dismal prognosis. Across hundreds of clinical trials, few novel approaches have translated to clinical practice while survival has improved by only a few months over the past three decades. Randomized controlled trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have seen impressive success for advanced or metastatic extracranial solid tumors, have so far failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit for patients with GBM. This has been secondary to GBM heterogeneity, the unique immunosuppressive CNS microenvironment, immune-evasive strategies by cancer cells, and the rapid evolution of tumor on therapy. This review aims to summarize findings from major clinical trials of ICIs for GBM, review historic failures, and describe currently promising avenues of investigation. We explore the biological mechanisms driving ICI responses, focusing on the role of the tumor microenvironment, immune evasion, and molecular biomarkers. Beyond conventional monotherapy approaches targeting PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, we describe emerging approaches for GBM, such as dual-agent ICIs, and combination of ICIs with oncolytic virotherapy, antigenic peptide vaccines, chimeric antigenic receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, along with nanoparticle-based delivery systems to enhance ICI efficacy. We highlight potential strategies for improving patient selection and treatment personalization, along with real-time, longitudinal monitoring of therapeutic responses through advanced imaging and liquid biopsy techniques. Integrated radiomics, tissue, and plasma-based analyses, may potentially uncover immunotherapeutic response signatures, enabling early, adaptive therapeutic adjustments. By specifically targeting current therapeutic challenges, outcomes for GBM patients may potentially be improved.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show limited success in glioblastoma (GBM) due to its complex tumor microenvironment. Novel strategies combining ICIs with other therapies may improve outcomes for GBM patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Cancer Biology
Background:
- Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with a poor prognosis, despite decades of research.
- Standard treatments offer limited survival benefits, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have largely failed in GBM clinical trials.
- GBM's unique immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and tumor heterogeneity contribute to therapeutic resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review clinical trials of ICIs for GBM, analyze reasons for failure, and explore promising future therapeutic avenues.
- To discuss biological mechanisms underlying ICI response and resistance in GBM.
- To highlight emerging strategies and personalized approaches for improving GBM immunotherapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of major clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for glioblastoma (GBM).
- Analysis of biological factors contributing to ICI efficacy and failure, including tumor microenvironment and immune evasion.
- Exploration of novel therapeutic combinations and monitoring techniques.
Main Results:
- Conventional ICI monotherapy has not demonstrated significant clinical benefit in GBM patients.
- GBM's immunosuppressive microenvironment, heterogeneity, and immune-evasive mechanisms hinder ICI effectiveness.
- Emerging strategies like dual-agent ICIs, combination therapies, and advanced monitoring show potential.
Conclusions:
- Current ICI approaches are insufficient for treating glioblastoma.
- Overcoming GBM-specific immune resistance requires innovative therapeutic strategies and personalized treatment selection.
- Combination therapies and advanced monitoring techniques offer promising avenues to improve GBM patient outcomes.

