Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Measuring Changes in Tactile Sensitivity in the Hind Paw of Mice Using an Electronic von Frey Apparatus
Published on: December 19, 2013
VipGrade® electronic clinical tool: retrospective evaluation on a paediatric cohort of European viper bites
Isabelle Claudet1,2, Hugo Germain1
1Paediatric Emergency Unit, Children's Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital Centre, Toulouse, France.
Introduction:
The VipGrade® is a French electronic clinical tool that was created in 2022 to help frontline clinicians grade envenomations due to European Vipera spp. and decide whether to use specific immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to test VipGrade® on a paediatric retrospective cohort (2001-2022) of cases of Vipera spp. envenomation and evaluate the concordance with the initial grading assigned by clinicians on admission.
Methods:
For each child in the cohort (n = 116), VipGrade® was applied by a single physician unaware of the initial clinical grading. We compared VipGrade® results with those obtained at the time of admission using the Audebert-Boels classification system.
Results:
The proportion of discrepancies represented 26% of initial grade I (n = 39) cases, meaning that 10 children were upgraded to grade IIa (n = 9) or IIb (n = 1). The main reason was the VipGrade® cut-off for oedema size (4 cm) to distinguish grade I from grade II, while oedema evaluation using the Audebert-Boels clinical classification differs in this regard. The global correlation κ score was equal to 0.78; 0.71 with the exception of grades 0 (which is not usually a diagnostic issue); 0.64 considering both results for young children (age <6 years, n = 51) and 0.79 for older ones.
Discussion:
Upgrading cases inappropriately could have a major impact on treatment and the use of the antivenom. Even if specific immunotherapy with Viperfav® (MicroPharm Ltd, Newcastle Emlyn, Carmarthenshire, SA38 9BY, United Kingdom) is safe, its use when inappropriate cannot be justified, particularly in times of supply shortage, as we have experienced over the last 10 years.
Conclusion:
The current version of the VipGrade® electronic clinical tool produces a different distribution of envenomation grades, notably in grade I by overgrading a substantial number of cases. We suggest creating a paediatric version that incorporates the same oedema evaluation method as the Audebert-Boels clinical classification but also includes a more refined definition of "local or regional" oedema.
More Related Videos
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management