Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial resolution analysis of computed tomographic images.

P A Assimakopoulos, D P Boyd, W Jaschke

    Investigative Radiology
    |March 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Albumin-based nanoparticles as contrast medium for MRI: vascular imaging, tissue and cell interactions, and pharmacokinetics of second-generation nanoparticles.

    Histochemistry and cell biology·2020
    Same author

    Evaluation of liver iron overload with R2* relaxometry with versus without fat suppression: both are clinically accurate but there are differences.

    European radiology·2020
    Same author

    Does gadoxetate disodium affect MRE measurements in the delayed hepatobiliary phase?

    European radiology·2018
    Same author

    Integrating interventional oncology in the treatment of liver tumors.

    European surgery : ACA : Acta chirurgica Austriaca·2018
    Same author

    Evaluation of an accelerated 3D SPACE sequence with compressed sensing and free-stop scan mode for imaging of the knee.

    European journal of radiology·2018
    Same author

    [Adverse effects of immunotherapy : Clinical aspects, radiological and nuclear medicine results].

    Der Radiologe·2017
    Same journal

    3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging of Optic Nerve Sheath.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity in 115,966 Patients: Risk Factors, Severity Profiles, and the Impact of Iodine Concentration on Reaction Risk.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Improvement of Lung Nodule Volumetric Accuracy with Photon-counting Computed Tomography Over Energy-integrating Computed Tomography in Low-dose Screening: A Phantom Study.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Photon-counting CT in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Improved Metal Artifact Reduction and Impact on Bone Fusion Assessment.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Body Imaging: Technical Basis, Current Applications, and Future Directions.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Digadoglucitol, a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for the Central Nervous System.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    This study quantifies spatial resolution in x-ray computed tomographic (CT) images using model-dependent and independent methods for Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) computation. The findings provide a comprehensive comparison of these techniques for assessing CT scanner performance.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Image Analysis

    Background:

    • Accurate quantification of spatial resolution is crucial for interpreting medical images.
    • Existing methods for Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) computation in X-ray computed tomography (CT) have limitations.
    • Comparing model-dependent and model-independent approaches is essential for robust resolution assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present and compare model-dependent and model-independent methods for quantifying spatial resolution in X-ray CT images.
    • To evaluate the accuracy and applicability of these methods using phantom studies.
    • To provide a framework for consistent MTF computation in CT imaging.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of model-dependent methods involving multiparameter fits of a 2D model function to image data.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of model-independent methods through numerical transformation of image data.
  • Utilizing phantom images with point, line, edge, and ring discontinuities for analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparison of MTF results obtained from both model-dependent and model-independent techniques.
    • Presentation of spatial resolution measurements for two different CT scanners (Imatron C-100 and a UCSF experimental scanner).
    • Validation of model-dependent predictions against model-independent results.

    Conclusions:

    • Both model-dependent and model-independent methods can effectively quantify spatial resolution in CT images.
    • The study provides valuable data for understanding and comparing different resolution quantification techniques.
    • Results contribute to the standardization and improvement of CT image quality assessment.