Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

TMS: Using the Theta-Burst Protocol to Explore Mechanism of Plasticity in Individuals with Fragile X Syndrome and Autism
Published on: December 28, 2010
Theta-Burst Stimulation Modulates Exercise Performance by Influencing Central Fatigue and Corticospinal Excitability
Camilla Martignon1, Chiara Barbi1, Gianluca Vernillo
1Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement, University of Verona, ITALY.
Purpose:
Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over the primary motor cortex modulates activity of the underlying neural tissue, but little is known about its consequence on neuromuscular fatigue and its neural correlates. This study aimed to compare the effects of facilitatory versus inhibitory TBS on the neuromuscular fatigue and excitability/inhibition of the corticospinal pathway in an unfatigued/fatigued muscle.
Methods:
The effects of three TBS protocols (facilitatory/intermittent: iTBS; inhibitory/continuous: cTBS, and sham: sTBS) were tested on exercise performance, neuromuscular function, and corticospinal excitability and inhibition in 20 young healthy participants. Transcranial magnetic and peripheral electrical stimulations were used at baseline, following TBS (unfatigued state), and after a fatiguing sustained contraction (fatigued state) at 35% of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the elbow flexors.
Results:
Time-to-task failure was shorter for cTBS (142 ± 51 s) and longer for iTBS (214 ± 68 s) compared with sTBS (173 ± 65 s) ( P < 0.05). In an unfatigued state, cTBS reduced MVIC and voluntary activation (VA), increased motor-evoked potential, and silent period ( P < 0.05), whereas iTBS did not cause any change. In a fatigued state, MVIC and VA decreased in all TBS sessions ( P < 0.05). However, the reduction in VA was larger after cTBS (Δ -18 ± 18%) compared with iTBS (Δ-3 ± 5%), and sTBS (Δ-9 ± 9%) ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, the increase in motor-evoked potential and silent period were greater for cTBS ( P < 0.05), compared with iTBS and sTBS ( P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Facilitatory TBS augments exercise performance that is independent of central parameters and corticospinal mechanisms, whereas inhibitory TBS attenuates exercise performance through an exacerbation in the development of central fatigue and possibly intracortical inhibition.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
10:09Mapping the After-effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on the Human Auditory Cortex with Functional Imaging
Published on: September 12, 2012