Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Utilization of Prognosis Assignment: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Military Periodontists
Richard E Sawaya1,2, Noel E Dickens1, Keith R Merchant1,2
1Naval Postgraduate Dental School, Naval Medical Leader and Professional Development Command, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
Introduction:
Prognosis is a forecast of the likely course of a disease and its future implications on treatment outcomes. The significance of periodontal prognosis in clinical practice is evident by its influence on treatment planning, communication, and in the retrospective evaluation of treatment results. While there are multiple well-known prognosis systems reported in the periodontal dental literature, there is an absence of data on the actual use of prognosis assignment among practicing clinicians. The purpose of this study was to survey military periodontists regarding their utilization of periodontal prognosis and associated systems and to evaluate prognosis' influence on treatment planning as well as its implications on operational dental readiness.
Methods:
A 19-question internet survey was disseminated to military periodontists in the U.S. Air Force, Army, and Navy via their respective Periodontal Consultants to the Surgeon Generals. The survey inquired on provider-specific demographic information, the provider's favored periodontal prognosis system, when and how prognosis is applied, and on the relationship between prognosis and operational dental readiness.
Results:
Fifty-five percent (n = 65 out of 120) of eligible survey participants completed the survey. Army (94.4%, n = 17) and Air Force (72.2%, n = 13) respondents preferred utilizing the Kwok and Caton periodontal prognosis system compared to 37.9% (n = 11) of Navy periodontists. Most respondents assigned prognosis at multiple time points in a patient's overall course of treatment (68%, n = 44), identified the severity of the periodontal presentation and the predictability of treatment outcomes as the most important factors involved in assigning a prognosis (82%, n = 55), and indicated that periodontal prognosis did not influence their dental readiness classification and vice versa.
Conclusions:
Kwok and Caton and McGuire periodontal prognosis systems were utilized by the majority of respondents but differed in utilization by military service branch. Respondents considered periodontal presentation severity and treatment outcome predictability the most important factors when assigning a prognosis. There was minimal influence between operational dental readiness and periodontal prognosis. Future research will evaluate prognosis system utilization in a broader population and will assess the impact of system standardization in education and clinical practice.
