Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025
Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: June 28, 2018
Development and validation of selection algorithms for a non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia semi-automated
Anna Mueller1, Marc Pfister1, Mirjam Faes Hesse1
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Objectives:
Semi-automated surveillance systems save time compared with traditional manual methods, particularly for non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (nvHAP), a nosocomial infection which can affect all non-intubated patients. In semi-automated surveillance, a computerized algorithm selects patients with high probability (i.e. "at risk") for subsequent manual confirmation. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of several single indicators and algorithms to preselect patients at risk for nvHAP.
Methods:
Single nvHAP indicators, identified based on literature, expert opinion and data availability, were combined to simple and complex algorithms. Both single indicators and algorithms were applied on a patient cohort of 157 902 patients, including 947 patients with nvHAP according to our reference standard, i.e. validated semi-automated nvHAP surveillance system plus the manual surveillance of patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia discharge diagnostic codes. Performance characteristics like sensitivity, workload reduction, and number of patients needed to be screened to detect one case of nvHAP were assessed.
Results:
Compared with the reference standard, single indicators had a sensitivity ranging from 35.1% (332/947) (oxygen desaturation) to 99.7% (944/947) (radiologic procedure). The workload reduction varied from 57.3% (90 505/157 902) (length of hospital stay >5 days) to 98.4% (155 453/157 902) (ICD-10 discharge diagnostic code). The highest workload reduction was found in complex algorithms, e.g. the combination "radiologic procedure including full text AND temporally related abnormal white blood count or fever AND antimicrobials AND C-reactive protein AND decreased oxygenation AND hospital stay ≥5 days AND no intubation" which reduced the number of patients who have to undergo manual review by 96.2% (151 867/157 902), while maintaining a sensitivity of 92% (871/947). The number needed to screen applying this algorithm was 6.4 patients.
Discussion:
Several single indicators and algorithms showed a high workload reduction and a sensitivity above the defined threshold of 90%. Our results could assist hospitals or stakeholders of surveillance initiatives in developing algorithms customized to their local conditions.
More Related Videos
07:39Tools for the Real-Time Assessment of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model
Published on: April 6, 2021
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
Related Concept Videos
01:30Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
01:28Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
01:30Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
01:30Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....