Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fractures: Bone Repair01:27

Fractures: Bone Repair

Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality of surgical technique in patients with a humeral shaft fracture in the HUMMER study (HUMMER-Survey): an international survey among expert surgeons.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

Internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty for Vancouver B2-B3 fractures: mortality and functional outcomes in frail patients. Insights from the PIPPAS study of 485 patients.

Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology·2025
Same author

Risk Factors and Predictors of 1-Year Mortality in 262 Vancouver Type C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Insights from the PIPPAS Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Effects of a Hypotension-Avoidance Versus a Hypertension-Avoidance Strategy on Neurocognitive Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

Is Force Control a Safe and Efficient Surgical Technology for Thoracolumbar Fusion Surgery? A Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study.

World neurosurgery·2025
Same author

Risk factors for one-year mortality in 440 femoral peri-implant fractures: insights from the PIPPAS prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Bone & joint open·2025
Same journal

Impact of osteoporosis on outcomes following ankle open reduction and internal fixation.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Cumulative traumatic life events and increased risk for emergency department and inpatient utilization after physical injury hospitalization.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Advances in the management of chest wall injuries - Influence of new technical options.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Trauma nursing as frontline health diplomacy: A binational ATCN program for Palestinian and Israeli nurses during conflict.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Neutralizing the odds: Biomechanical protection by adiposity offsets physiological burden to explain the trauma.'obesity-paradox`" [Injury 57 (2) (2026) 112913].

Injury·2026
Same journal

Agreement between ChatGPT and emergency physicians in laceration management: A prospective study.

Injury·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
08:04

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis

Published on: March 11, 2017

9.3K

Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. Does cement augmentation decrease mechanical failures and increase

Héctor J Aguado1, Sergio País-Ortega2, Virginia García-Virto2

  • 1Traumatology and Orthopaedics Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid, Av. Ramón y Cajal, 47007, Valladolid, Spain; School of Medicine, Valladolid University, Av. Ramón y Cajal, 47007, Valladolid, Spain.

Injury
|November 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cement augmentation for extracapsular proximal femoral fractures (EPFF) in elderly patients did not improve functional outcomes or reduce mechanical complications. The technique was found to be safe but did not enhance bone-implant fixation or fracture stability.

Keywords:
Bone cement augmentationCut-outElderlyMechanical failureOlder adultsOsteoporosisProximal femoral fractureTFNATip-apex distance

More Related Videos

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position
06:58

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position

Published on: August 17, 2017

10.0K
A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
08:20

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
08:04

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis

Published on: March 11, 2017

9.3K
Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position
06:58

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position

Published on: August 17, 2017

10.0K
A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
08:20

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Geriatric trauma
  • Biomaterials in orthopedics

Background:

  • Extracapsular proximal femoral fractures (EPFF) in the elderly are often managed with intramedullary nails, but osteoporosis can lead to poor bone-implant fixation and functional decline.
  • Cement augmentation of the cephalic blade was hypothesized to improve the bone-implant interface and reduce mechanical failure in EPFF management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of cement augmentation of the cephalic blade in intramedullary nailing for elderly patients with EPFF.
  • To assess the impact of cement augmentation on functional outcomes, mechanical complications, and radiological parameters.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study included 58 patients (≥70 years) with type 31-A EPFF treated with intramedullary nailing.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: those who received cement augmentation of the cephalic blade and those who did not.
  • Evaluations included demographic data, clinical/functional parameters, complications, mortality, and radiological assessments (tip-apex distance, blade position, fixation failure).

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed between the augmented and non-augmented groups in terms of medical complications, surgical complications, mortality, or mechanical failure at one-year follow-up.
  • The mean tip-apex distance (TAD) and the position of the helical blade were comparable between the groups.
  • While augmentation did not increase medical complications, specific adverse events like intra-articular cement leak and avascular necrosis were noted in the augmented group.

Conclusions:

  • Cement augmentation of the cephalic blade in EPFF management in the elderly does not improve functional outcomes or reduce mechanical complications.
  • The augmentation technique did not negatively impact fracture reduction or helical blade positioning and was not associated with increased medical complications.
  • Cement augmentation is a safe technique for EPFF but does not offer superior clinical or radiological benefits compared to standard intramedullary nailing.