Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records01:18

Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records

1.1K
Source-oriented records, or SOR, are medical record-keeping organized by the data source. The SOR system was first developed in the mid-1900s to organize the growing patient data in hospitals and other healthcare facilities.
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
1.1K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

105
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
105
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

882
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
882
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

3.0K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
3.0K
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

914
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
914

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A system capable of verifiably and privately screening global DNA synthesis.

National science review·2026
Same author

The dual role of the microbiome in sepsis: A complex interplay between pathogenicity and protection.

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same author

Unraveling the enigma: Post-translational modifications in psychiatric disorders and their regulatory mechanisms.

Journal of translational internal medicine·2026
Same author

Interplay between ischemia-reperfusion and metabolic reprogramming.

Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death·2026
Same author

Cell death crosstalk in NET-Driven inflammation: mechanisms, disease contexts, and therapeutic perspectives.

Biomarker research·2026
Same author

Stromal and endothelial transcriptional changes during progression from MGUS to myeloma and after treatment response.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices.

Haoling Zhang1, Alberto Maillo1, Sumeer Ahmad Khan1,2

  • 1Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 4700 Thuwal, Jeddah, 23955, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
|November 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Research software is vital for scientific discovery and reproducibility. This review proposes new principles, reviewability and supportability, to enhance software evaluation in scientific research.

Keywords:
Deductive argumentsDevelopment considerationsPeer review strategiesResearch reproducibilityResearch softwareReviewabilitySupportability

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Life sciences
  • Scientific computing

Background:

  • Research software has become central to scientific discovery, particularly in life sciences.
  • It accelerates data analysis, simulations, and modeling, reducing costs and increasing research pace.
  • Software is crucial for ensuring reproducibility, a key aspect of scientific integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the characteristics and evolution of research software.
  • To propose two new principles, reviewability and supportability, to enhance software evaluation.
  • To guide scientists in developing and understanding best practices for research software.

Main Methods:

  • Mini-review of research software characteristics and historical development.
  • Analysis of current requirements and guidelines for research software.
  • Proposal of new principles complementing existing FAIR principles.

Main Results:

  • Research software significantly impacts scientific discovery and reproducibility.
  • Existing FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) are foundational.
  • Two new principles, reviewability and supportability, are proposed to improve software evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Well-developed, accessible research software enhances transparency and error detection.
  • The proposed principles of reviewability and supportability aim to improve the peer review process for software.
  • These principles will assist scientists in adopting best practices for research software development.