Redefining Cardiac Antibody-Mediated Rejection With Donor-Specific Antibodies and Graft Dysfunction

Jason F Goldberg1,2,3, Xin Tian3,4, Ann Bon5

  • 1Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., P.S.).

Circulation. Heart Failure
|November 25, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Heart transplant recipients with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and graft dysfunction, even without biopsy-confirmed rejection, face increased risks. Identifying these patients early is crucial for better outcomes and survival.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplant Immunology
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • Heart transplant recipients with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are at higher risk for antibody-mediated rejection.
  • Many patients with graft dysfunction and DSAs lack definitive evidence of antibody-mediated rejection on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical significance of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) combined with graft dysfunction in heart transplant recipients.
  • To assess the association between antibody-mediated rejection categories and long-term clinical outcomes, including death and left ventricular dysfunction.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, multicenter study involving serial endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), echocardiograms, DSA monitoring, and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) evaluations.
  • Outcomes were defined as positive pathological antibody-mediated rejection (pAMR+) or DSA with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LVEF drop ≥10% to ≤50%).
  • Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association between rejection categories and adverse clinical outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were present in 40% of patients.
  • Median %dd-cfDNA was significantly higher in patients with pAMR+ or DSA+/LV dysfunction compared to those without.
  • Both pAMR+ and DSA+/LV dysfunction were significantly associated with increased risk of death or prolonged LV dysfunction, with DSA+/LV dysfunction showing a substantially higher hazard ratio.

Conclusions:

  • Expanding the definition of antibody-mediated rejection to include patients with DSAs and concurrent allograft dysfunction is critical.
  • Patients with DSAs and graft dysfunction, even without biopsy-proven rejection, are at significant risk for adverse outcomes, including death.
  • Early identification of these high-risk patients is essential for improved management and long-term survival in heart transplantation.
Abstract