Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Response to Preoperative Steroid Injections Can Predict Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Spine·2026

Same author

Complications of spinal fusion: comparing Medicare transforming episode accountability (TEAM) hospitals to control hospitals.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026

Same author

Hospital characteristics and episode cost differences between participant and nonparticipant hospitals in Medicare's Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM) bundle payment program.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026

Same author

Evaluating the Optimal Treatment Pathway for Volar Wrist Ganglia: A Cost-Minimization Analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025

Same author

Long-term outcomes and resource Utilization related to upper extremity off-roading vehicle injuries.

Journal of hand and microsurgery·2025

Same author

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in a Postoperative Carpal Tunnel Surgery Population.

The Journal of hand surgery·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

How to Estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference: An Overview.

Hernan Roca¹, Gretchen Maughan, Brian Karamian

¹Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Clinical Spine Surgery

|November 25, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) helps interpret patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) changes. Reporting both anchor and distribution-based MCID estimates ensures patient-perceived relevance and statistical significance.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Published on: May 28, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Published on: May 28, 2013

Area of Science:

Health outcomes research
Clinical trial methodology

Background:

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for interpreting changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
It represents a threshold for patient-perceived symptom changes, vital for population-level analysis.
High variability in MCID estimates is a significant limitation due to the absence of a gold standard methodology.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the variability in MCID estimation.
To propose a strategy for robust MCID determination.
To ensure both patient-relevance and statistical validity in PROM interpretation.

Main Methods:

Review of existing MCID methodologies.
Comparison of anchor-based and distribution-based approaches.
Synthesis of strategies for improved MCID estimation.

Main Results:

MCID estimation is characterized by high variability.
Anchor-based methods capture patient-perceived relevance.
Distribution-based methods provide statistical significance.

Conclusions:

Reporting both anchor-based and distribution-based MCID estimates is recommended.
This dual approach enhances the clinical relevance and statistical validity of PROM changes.
This strategy improves the interpretation of PROMs at a population level.