Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological concerns in bioethics.

L B McCullough

    The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Elective delivery at 34 weeks vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2019
    Same author

    Preventing enthusiasm in response to clinical advances.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2019
    Same author

    The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017
    Same author

    The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017
    Same author

    Fulfilling professional responsibilities when counselling patients about Zika infection.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2016
    Same author

    Three decades after Baby Doe: how neonatologists and bioethicists conceptualize the Best Interests Standard.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2016
    Same journal

    Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    "It's Shaking Your Entire Construction as a Human Being": A Qualitative Analysis on Epistemic Injustice and Medical Gaslighting Consequences in Patients Living with Chronic Pain.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    See all related articles

    This paper explores key methodological challenges in bioethics, including its relationship with medical and professional ethics. It also examines bioethics in secular, pluralistic societies and its institutional impact.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Medical Ethics
    • Professional Ethics

    Background:

    • Methodological concerns are increasingly central to the bioethics agenda.
    • The paper addresses the evolving landscape of bioethics and its interdisciplinary nature.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine methodological concerns in bioethics.
    • To analyze the relationship between medical ethics and bioethics/professional ethics.
    • To explore the impact of bioethics on academic institutions.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of bioethics and medical ethics.
    • Examination of methodological issues in professional ethics.
    • Inquiry into bioethics within secular, pluralistic societies.

    Main Results:

    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Distinguishes medical ethics as a subset of bioethics versus professional ethics.
    • Highlights methodological challenges in treating medical ethics as professional ethics.
    • Discusses the role of 'federal ethics' and public commissions.

    Conclusions:

    • Bioethics is a complex field with significant methodological considerations.
    • The institutional impact of bioethics on universities is a growing concern.
    • Understanding these methodological aspects is crucial for future bioethics research and policy.