Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Posterior Approach for Debridement of the Psoas Abscess
Published on: March 2, 2020
A Validation Study of the Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Code K75.0 for Pyogenic Liver Abscess
Margarita Dudina1,2, Kirstine Kobberøe Søgaard1,3, Søren Schou Olesen3,4
1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark.
Purpose:
Routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious diseases. We examined the validity of the ICD-10 diagnosis code K75.0 for pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) from hospital discharge registries.
Patients And Methods:
This validation study was conducted in the North Denmark Region, using data from Aalborg University Hospital and the North Denmark Regional Hospital, along with their smaller regional satellite hospitals. The study period extended from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2022, covering a catchment population of approximately 590,000 inhabitants. We identified patients with a first diagnosis (primary or secondary) of PLA (ICD-10 code K75.0) recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry and estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of the PLA diagnosis using medical records as the reference standard. Subanalyses of PPV were conducted based on the department setting (emergency, medical, or surgical).
Results:
A total of 297 patients received an ICD-10 diagnosis code of K75.0 during the study period. Five (2.0%) patients were excluded due to initial hospitalization outside the North Denmark Region, and 67 (23%) were misclassified. The overall PPV for the K75.0 diagnosis code during the study period was 77% (95% CI: 72-82%). The highest PPV, 88% (95% CI: 81-93%), was observed in patients diagnosed in medical departments, while the lowest PPV, 56% (95% CI: 30-80%), was observed in patients diagnosed in emergency wards. The PPV for surgical departments was 69% (95% CI: 61-77%).
Conclusion:
The overall PPV of the ICD-10 diagnosis code K75.0 for PLA was 77%. Variability in PPVs across departments suggested differences in diagnostic accuracy, with medical departments demonstrating the highest PPV.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...

