Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of the...
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reverse electron transfer at mitochondrial complex I restrains dopaminergic neuron activity to promote early-life sleep in <i>Drosophila</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Desmoplastic Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Providing Reminders and Education Prior to lung cancer screening: Feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel approach to address disparities in lung cancer screening.

Translational behavioral medicine·2025
Same author

Population parameters of Drosophila larval cooperative foraging.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2024
Same author

Multilevel approaches to address disparities in lung cancer screening: a study protocol.

Implementation science communications·2024
Same author

Birth temperature followed by a visual critical period determines cooperative group membership.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2021
Same journal

Crepuscular vocal partitioning and thermal limits on calling behavior in the Bubbling Kassina (Kassina senegalensis) in a sub-equatorial savanna.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Jewel beetles, Buprestidae, modulate bright structural colours by multileveled optical engineering and surface sculpting.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

E122Q rhodopsin: pigment microspectrophotometry, photoreceptor light responses, and bleaching adaptation.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Greater Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus nippon) gradually converge their echolocation call frequency to colony members.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Iridescence, polarisation and directionality of Morpho butterfly displays.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila
13:01

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila

Published on: November 4, 2013

13.2K

Do wild-caught fly larvae cooperatively forage?

Rives Kuhar1, Madeline Williamson1, Peyton Yee1

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA.

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|November 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Wild fly larvae form cooperative foraging clusters, with varying abilities to join different groups. This clustering behavior benefits multiple species, suggesting important ecological roles in Drosophila communities.

Keywords:
CooperationDrosophilaFitnessForagingGroup membershipSocial behaviorWild type behavior

More Related Videos

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

9.3K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Bradysia coprophila's Unique Biology &#8211; A Guide to Laboratory Maintenance
04:26

Author Spotlight: Exploring Bradysia coprophila's Unique Biology – A Guide to Laboratory Maintenance

Published on: April 19, 2024

918

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila
13:01

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila

Published on: November 4, 2013

13.2K
Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

9.3K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Bradysia coprophila's Unique Biology &#8211; A Guide to Laboratory Maintenance
04:26

Author Spotlight: Exploring Bradysia coprophila's Unique Biology – A Guide to Laboratory Maintenance

Published on: April 19, 2024

918

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Cooperative foraging is common in animals, requiring adherence to group rules.
  • Drosophila larvae form clusters for efficient feeding, excluding non-synchronous individuals.
  • The occurrence and selectivity of clustering in wild fly larvae are largely unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate clustering behavior in wild-caught Drosophila larvae across multiple species.
  • To determine the extent of selectivity in group membership for larval clusters.
  • To explore the fitness consequences of interspecies larval clustering.

Main Methods:

  • Field collection of larval clusters from rotting fruit, identifying seven fly species.
  • Laboratory clustering assays using five wild-caught lines and 20 inbred wild-caught lines.
  • Assessment of inter- and intra-species clustering capacities and adult fitness outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Clustering behavior was observed in all tested species except Drosophila suzukii.
  • Significant variation in the capacity to join different clusters was found both between and within species.
  • Larval co-clustering generally conferred mutual fitness benefits to participating fly lines.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple Drosophila species exhibit co-clustering behavior in larval stages.
  • Interspecies larval clustering demonstrates significant ecological implications within Drosophila communities.
  • The ability to co-cluster varies genetically, but often results in positive fitness outcomes.